Rein rechtlich gesehen kann es doch nicht unklar sein. Solange die AfD nicht verboten ist müssen Konsequenzen illegale Diskriminierung sein. Nach einem Verbot sind Konsequenzen Pflicht. Korrekt wäre dann, wenn dies nur für Menschen gilt, die sich weiter engagieren. Gesetze dürfen nicht rückwirkend etwas bestrafen das legal war.
That door is locked.
The cartoon is apt. It’s even worse. Pilots don’t fly without the approval of airline management.
The door to the cockpit is locked. If there has been a discussion or if there is just this vote, the powerlessness of those regular passengers shows that anti-intellectualism is an isolated problem. It only looks dangerous to those who don’t remember the locked door.
There is only one choice: feeling or rationality.
When you feel, you do what feels best.
When you think, you do what is the most valuable.
So no free will but that choice.
Just one article about the work conditions: https://africame.factsanddetails.com/article/entry-190.html
It could be that building the pyramids was not the regular job of the laborers. It was a communal experience like going to burnig man.
Society would be different if there would be one project that everybody builds together. It would be as unifying as a big war, without the disadvantages of a war.
It’s not the same because the president doesn’t represent society in a democracy in the same way.
For Egypt, the pharaoh was the thing that made Egypt. Kind o like the Dalai Lama or Jesus, the pharaoh was the son of horus, the incarnation of the principle of ruling. I am not an expert but I would say that the pyramid was built for that principle and not the person itself, whereas Trump has a Trump tower to make himself known.
If it isn’t Trump but e.g. Taylor Swift, I could imagine fans to build something for her, e.g. her next stage set, if she offers to provide food and housing.
For democracy though, society should build something that doesn’t celebrate one person but the community. E.g. China has a day when every citizen plants a tree. When you see the effect after some years, you can feel the transforming power of the community.
People would have time to debate political issues. Their job wouldn’t take the biggest part of their life so they wouldn’t link their identity with their job. Social customs would change so that the people who should work 40 hours for the benefit of all prefer other jobs. Scarcity of applicants would also shift the power towards the employees for wage negotiations.
It’s possible and could improve society massively, but too risky for the current business owners to implement on their own.
This part of the FAQ makes the project interesting:
Services like Google’s Search Console allow website operators to optimize their search page for Google – thus Google crowdsources the robust parsing without making this information available to third parties.
A new search engine is at a disadvantage without that data. Website operators don’t bother maintaining their information at an unknown search engine. Hopefully OWS becomes popular enough that operators use it, e.g. to indicate when their site needs a recrawl or which parts of their site have to be indexed.
Pyramids were most likely not built by slaves. They were communal projects.
We need something like the pyramids today. Communal projects that show the strength of the community.
Because it represents the tipping point where America lost its dominance. Starbucks doesn’t sell coffee but an affordable access to experiencing the American way of life.
If Starbucks loses its appeal it means that people stop looking up to America. Students won’t dream of becoming a scientist in America, business men won’t long for participating in the American economy, consumers don’t care about buying American products for being American.
All American products from now on have to compete on quality and service. This changes the value of the products and the value of the work that American workers deliver.
The latter made me aware of the former.
This is such a sad ‘isolanistic’ approach. There are other countries in Europe with a less tight labor market. Production could be moved there. Everybody would be happy.
But production is supposed to be automated. The number of newly installed robots compared to China doesn’t make Europe look good.
The plan can only be to push through the next couple of years until OpenAI, Google and Boston Dynamics have developed the robots to take over production.
The names were first. The locations are named after names.
Even America was a name first.
Like always, google is doing things for free to get training data.
All things are going into an authoritarian direction which needs control of the opposition. Google will have the infrastructure to identify people with opposing mindsets. There won’t be a rebellion if the rebel leaders can be locked up in time.
The biggest pill was that I am not intelligent. I was just studious and invested enough time to pass exams. People not doing what they should do is not them being stupid but me not grasping the full picture.
The second biggest pill that I am still swallowing is that I am not a good person. I try to behave in a good way, but it’s manipulative and not authentic. People don’t like goodness if it doesn’t come from the heart.
Also, when you finally say “no” to them, they act as though you’re a terrible person.
To them, it looks like they are the only person to which you say no. This means that you say no because of them. People don’t like being questioned like that.
Add some assurance that the no is not personal.
It seems like you escape your inner conflicts by being industrious.
Not professional advice but instead of going, you could halt posting for a moment and focus on your breathing. It will assure you that you are safe, and you can let the conflicts become a bit more aware without feeling overwhelmed by the terror. Do this for some time and you create the space to transform your conflicts.
Same as with regular medicine, book a flight to India or Mexico.
https://www.rechtslexikon.net/d/verfassungstreue/verfassungstreue.htm
Gesichert rechtsextrem ist aber nicht verfassungsfeindlich. Bei der Einstufung geht es nur um den Umfang der Überwachung.
Es gilt sogar
Damit gilt das Gegenteil, selbst ein AfD Verbot reicht nicht.
Die Tagesschau vermeidet leider eine genaue Analyse der Rechtslage.