• MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    136
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I don’t see how that’s a “boomer” complaint lol I’m a millennial and don’t know anyone that’s excited to pay monthly fees for something they already bought

    • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I blame iPhone and Android apps that required developers to keep paying a $100 minimum yearly fee to keep an app in the App Store.

      There were tons $1-$5 apps in the early days of the stores, but 3-4 years in they switched to either freemium subscriptions or adware (or ad ransom models). Usually as publishers bought out indie devs, if they just didn’t copy them anyway.

    • edric@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yeah. The subscription model really only took off during GenZ.

      • Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        not only that, but people usually use boomer, in this context, to say that the complaint is stupid, or selfish, or something

        the gradual loss of ownership is a real fucking issue

      • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        And no gen-Z is happy about this model or pushing its use. It’s mostly being pushed by Gen-X and Boomer executives as a further mode of profit extraction in our rentier economic system.

        • zout@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Sure, we’ll just wait for the gen-Z executives to roll it al back then right? It’ll never happen, this is a money thing, not a generation thing.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I’ve always blamed Adobe for the subscription mess, and that started in the early 00’s.

      • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 hours ago

        There was a joke about “rethinking the Microsoft model” in a 2005 episode of The Office. The move to subscription based software has been in the works for 25 years or more.

        • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          This has been the goal of Microsoft for 20 years, like you stated. Bill Gates stated it. We’re just now to the point of ubiquitous internet connectivity, and cultural conditioning to accept this model.

          Windows itself is eventually going to be a subscription service, with all your data saved on Microsoft’s servers. Microsoft announced at the end of last year a dumb Office terminal that does just this, to test the waters.

    • ZMoney@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s because a lot of boomers own their homes and the concept of rent is foreign to them.

      • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The thing is, you never really “own” your home. Don’t pay your property taxes, and see what happens. You just pay less when the mortgage loan is paid off.

    • dreamless_day@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Because software needs to be maintained. Well at least most software that has a subscription model is maintained and gets regular updates. People don’t work for free, you have to pay them

      • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 hours ago

        That’s the result of a fucked business model. Many software devs came and went prior to the subscription model. Technofeudalism is not wanted by anyone but the software publishers.

        • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          To them, it’s the perfect business model. Keep you customers in perpetual debt, and dependent.

        • dreamless_day@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          I don’t think you can compare software from like 20 years ago to software today.

          Things got way more complicated and applications require a lot more work

    • Zaphod@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Most boomers don’t even use any paid software aside from Windows and an antivirus they got tricked into buying