meanwhile, companies are killing lifetime licenses that were previously paid for.
Yep I remember clearly the first time this happened to me with Splashtop Remote in like 2012. And more recently 4K video downloader. “4K video downloader is being deprecated, please upgrade to our new application, 4K video downloader” Literally only difference is my lifetime license is no longer good and I’d have to buy a subscription.
Well, too bad there are easier ways to download content and even if there wasn’t you have made sure I will never get anywhere near your products ever again.
Ironically this made me donate to the lemmy instance my account is on. For the cost of just 3 bags of coffee a year I raised the monthly donations by 1%. Feels good man.
Do kids these days think boomers are 20yo?
All kids think anyone older than them is a boomer. Actual boomers think all kids are millennials. Millennials can’t catch a fucking break at either end.
I thought it was a boomer is “older than me” and a millennial is “dem youngens”. /s
B2B SaaS
I myself also hate to pay for subscriptions and heavily favor to buy something only one time. But I also understand why something like software is sold as a subscription. If you take “normal”, physical products like smartphones, cars or literally almost anything else, it is accepted that you have to buy a new one every few years (the time span obviously varies from product to product) and that repairs will also cost money, at least after the guarantee ends. But software is expected and required to be maintained, thus costing the developer money even after you bought it. Online features also lead to sever costs. Because of that, a subscription can be compared to paying for car repairs and maintenance. I think it would be fair if you bought a version of a product for a fixed price, which you could use indefinitely and then to take a small price to upgrade to newer versions.
I think it would be fair if you bought a version of a product for a fixed price, which you could use indefinitely and then to take a small price to upgrade to newer versions
I mean that’s exactly how it used to work. You’d buy Office 2004, you could use it forever. When the new one released you could choose to upgrade if you wanted.
Same with Adobe stuff and everything really
I just hate it for stuff I am going to use sporadically. Like iracing. In summer I’ll use it like once a month. In winter maybe like 4 times a week. But the price doesn’t change. I could not use it for 3 months and then I wasted that money. I don’t like that. Also, you never own anything then, which is what they want.
piracy my dudes. stop giving them money altogether.
Yarr! Raise the black flag!
Why i wont use iRacing. Sucks that it’s so popular.
If that’s a boomer complaint then hell yes I’m a fucking boomer! Fuck your subscription!
It is definitely not a boomer complaint, man’s not paying like 2 bills a month for 10 different subscriptions for the newest shit hollywood productions only for the one tv show I want to be unavailable across all of them smh 🤦♂️
FOSS users pay zero times.
Though hopefully contribute in other ways, like code improvements (not necessarily to every project:-).
Seeing a subscription actually makes my decision easy. I see it and immediately know to avoid.
I don’t see how that’s a “boomer” complaint lol I’m a millennial and don’t know anyone that’s excited to pay monthly fees for something they already bought
I blame iPhone and Android apps that required developers to keep paying a $100 minimum yearly fee to keep an app in the App Store.
There were tons $1-$5 apps in the early days of the stores, but 3-4 years in they switched to either freemium subscriptions or adware (or ad ransom models). Usually as publishers bought out indie devs, if they just didn’t copy them anyway.
It’s because a lot of boomers own their homes and the concept of rent is foreign to them.
Yeah. The subscription model really only took off during GenZ.
not only that, but people usually use boomer, in this context, to say that the complaint is stupid, or selfish, or something
the gradual loss of ownership is a real fucking issue
In the future, you’ll own nothing and like it!
And no gen-Z is happy about this model or pushing its use. It’s mostly being pushed by Gen-X and Boomer executives as a further mode of profit extraction in our rentier economic system.
Sure, we’ll just wait for the gen-Z executives to roll it al back then right? It’ll never happen, this is a money thing, not a generation thing.
I’ve always blamed Adobe for the subscription mess, and that started in the early 00’s.
There was a joke about “rethinking the Microsoft model” in a 2005 episode of The Office. The move to subscription based software has been in the works for 25 years or more.
deleted by creator
Most boomers don’t even use any paid software aside from Windows and an antivirus they got tricked into buying
How is that a boomer complaint? It’s basic. Microsoft Word should be buy once for 3 computers, as it always was until subs took over.
We can’t even read the news anymore without a sub.
I like the use of the word rent for this.
I think it depends on the type of software. Subscriptions do make sense for software that requires regular updates, e.g. something tax related, where you need it updated with the latest regulations every year. Basically for anything that won’t be useful a year from the purchase date without feature updates.
The News is something you should have to pay a subscription for.
Nah, absolutely not. Putting a profit incentive on the news is how we end up with how the news currently is - reaction-bait with the sole purpose of driving engagement and views to generate ad revenue, instead of actual, unbiased, honest journalism.
Not paying for the news is quite literally how we have found ourselves in this situation. When more were paying for the news they were less dependent on ad dollars and more on subscribers. The shift towards free news with the popularization of the web is what created our problem.
I wouldn’t say it was just that. News also got worse on e.g. government supported TV channels in countries that have them. Part of the problem is the regurgitation of social media on the news and also news organizations being afraid of social media backlash. Another part is politicians not giving interviews to organizations that ask them hard questions, that one was probably better in the past because there were more limited numbers of news sources.
Gatekeeping the news? No ty.
Do you think the news just appears on webpages for us to consume?
Particularly in the case of investigative journalism, there is a skill involved in writing the stories, and it consumes the time and effort of many people.
Charging money for your work is not “gatekeeping.” It’s how you keep eating.
It’s not gatekeeping. You are paying for a service so that it can continue to persist.
Subbed!
It’s like you don’t get the idea at all!
Shit, they got me!
Boomer complaint? Why can’t I smoke an after dinner cigarette at the restaurant in peace without people whining at me to get up and go outside? And what is it with all this “rap music” on the radio? I’ll rather take Chet Baker any day of the week.
Why don’t kids just walk into the store, shake hands with a manager, and get a job immediately?
Somebody understood the assignment! That being said smokers while you are still eating are pretty tough on some people.
Duh, just sit in the non smoking section and you’ll be fine.
Boomer? Thats just a HUMAN complaint!
