• slaneesh_is_right
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    I just saw a video about a new Chevrolet pickup truck. For some reason i thought it might be good. Because pickup trucks is all anericans care about. It’s huuuuge and absolute garbage with a 80k price tag.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        You’re comparing a full size to a mid size, crew cab vs regular cab

        If you compare the same model (two F150 for example) with the same type of body (crew cab 6’ bed) you quickly realize that their size hasn’t increased by that much since the 90s (and the growth mostly comes from having to meet safety standards). If you use proportions the same model of car will have blown up way more over the same period (example: the mk6 Jetta is the size of a 12 years older Passat).

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          10 days ago

          I thought their point was that they hate the large size, not that they were comparing apples to apples

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            10 days ago

            Thing is barely anyone actually buys regular cabs so from the get go it’s a bad comparison as sure those small trucks existed, but there weren’t that many on the road. When you look at an extended cab mid size with 6’ bed truck today vs in 1995 you end up with a truck that is taller sure (the design makes it look worse than it actually is really), but isn’t actually that much larger or longer. The same thing is true for all trucks if your compare apples to apples.

            If you then take cash tests into consideration well things don’t look good for those small trucks from back in the day… Body-on-frame isn’t the best for crumple zones and stuff like that, but it’s necessary to take actual load.

            So yeah, people can complain that super small trucks don’t exist anymore but if they did they wouldn’t buy them anyway.

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                10 days ago

                That’s where the complaints come from so yes North America is the market I’m talking about

                Truck specs aren’t hard to find either, people don’t bother checking the actual measurements though and instead rely on bad comparisons like a Ford Ranger with a regular cab vs an F150 with a crew cab to prove their point

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 days ago

                  That’s where the complaints come from

                  Not necessarily, those kinds of huge vehicles are showing up in Europe too and a lot of Europeans HATE them. And this article is about the Chinese not liking them…

                  And you’re missing the point entirely. The complaints are coming from people that are specifically ignoring the class of truck when comparing, as they do not want larger classes to even exist. They do not believe these enormous monstrosities should be a thing, so why in the world would they ever compare them to other trucks they consider monstrosities? “Hey guys see, out of these two things I hate, one is worse!” ???

                  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 days ago

                    Then compare a Ford Ranger (like on the picture) from back in the day to a current model year and you’ll soon realize that with the same build they’re pretty similar in size, as I mentioned before. You can’t complain that X got bigger if your comparison is with Y. Small trucks still exist, people don’t compare with them because it would prove their point moot.

                    If they don’t want larger classes of trucks to exist at all they should stop saying that “things were better back then” and should instead say “these things shouldn’t have been invented back in 1953!” but that’s not what they do becausr they created a fictional world in their minds where full size trucks weren’t full size trucks 30 years ago.

            • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              10 days ago

              My dad has a brand new reg cab f250 long bed (8ft) and it is quite bigger than his 88’ reg cab f150 long bed.

              Also, people would absolutely by small trucks if they were available. The ford ranger was a top seller all the way until they discontinued it. The maverick struggles to stay on lots… there is clearly demand, but they dont have big profit margins like the mid size market has.

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                10 days ago

                F250 vs F150, compare both for the same year and it will be the same story.

                Are people being oblivious on purpose or something?