• barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 minutes ago

    American Revolution. French Revolution. Iranian Revolution.

    Just a few very violent, and successful, revolutions.

  • hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    my fucking ass 👅🥾

    Bolsheviks, Stonewall riots, suffragettes, all famously peaceful movements that got their rights by staying on their knees and asking nicely.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    35 minutes ago

    General strikes accomplish a fuck of a lot more in a shorter amount of time. When the owners of the administration can’t get their poptarts to the stores to be sold, the bank calls their loans and shit gets real.

    • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 minutes ago

      Right after Covid ended, the nurses in the NYC hospitals decided that after being so heroic for over a year, they deserved raises, and some other benefits. The hospitals flat-out refused anything.

      The nurses went on strike. Within 72 hours, every single one of their demands was met, including a fat raise.

      Unions and strikes work.

  • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Let me know what all the peaceful protests on climate change did leading up to and since the Paris Agreement.

    Civil disobedience, including violent action, absolutely has a place in changing the policy of the state.

  • Octagon9561@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    This is complete utter propaganda, especially considering it’s coming from the BBC. History has shown us time and time again that the ruling class never gives up its power peacefully.

  • fdnomad@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I honestly cant recall seeing any peaceful protest accomplishing anything of significance in my lifetime. Most successful protests I hear about are the French lighting up Paris when they try to raise the retirement age. They just try again 2 years later though.

  • perestroika@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    There’s a book on the subject written by Srdja Popovic.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blueprint_for_Revolution

    Summary: protests that start (and try to remain) non-violent have a greater chance to succeed, because they can attract more people to their cause.

    Critique: with some regimes, it’s not possible to non-violently protest. For non-violent protest to work, the environment must respect a minimum amount of human rights.

    Case samples:

    • US during the civil rights movement era: yes
    • USSR under Gorbachev: yes
    • Serbia under Milosevic: yes, with difficulty on every step (Popovic was there doing it)
    • Israel under Netanyahu: probably yes
    • China under Xi: practically no (not for long)
    • USSR under Kruschev/Brezhnev/Andropov/Chernenko: not really
    • Russia under Putin: no, don’t even hold a blank sheet of paper
    • Iran under Khamenei: only if you’re doing a bread riot
    • Saudi Arabia, USSR under Stalin, NK under the Kim dynasty: no, and execution would be a possible outcome

    …etc. In some places, you can’t organize. Then your only option is to fight. As long as you can publicly organize, definitely do so - it’s vastly preferable. :)

  • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Thanks Bernie the sheepdog.
    Make sure the sheep don’t make waves.
    And don’t forget to say pissrahell has aright to defend itself

  • Ougie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Well that’s total bs, in Greece there’s been dozens of non-violent protests far exceeding 3.5% that have failed spectacularly.

    • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Clue: peaceful protests in the entire western world achieved nothing for the past half a century. You had the massive Greece protests, the Gilets Jeunes in France, the 15-M in Spain, the Occupy Movement in the US, the BLM protests in the US too, the anti Iraq war protests all over Europe… None of them achieved anything meaningful. The EU and US are NOT democratic.

  • lemonaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Didn’t BLM 2020 protests have over 3.5%? I don’t think they accomplished much except put pressure to prosecute Chauvin. Like literally just that one guy.

  • 10001110101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Liberal three-percenter lore?

    I mean, I do think non-violent disobedience can be effective, but the state usually makes it violent. State sanctioned protests where most obey most of the rules isn’t disobedience. Is a good start though, and I hope things progress (in a good way).

  • psychadlligoat@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    5 hours ago

    lol of course this garbage bootlicker propaganda is left up on .world, a classic example of their quality modding skills

    glad to see the comments calling it out for what it is

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    While this is obviously not true. It is hilarious seeing that some comments call bullshit on this while thinking that violent protests have any better chance to succeed.