Nonviolent protests are twice as likely to succeed as armed conflicts – and those engaging a threshold of 3.5% of the population have never failed to bring about change.
I said not interested.
And the other answers: “out-of-context, manipulative, anticommunist, CIA-sponsored atrocity propaganda” shows people know what you’re doing.
So calling you out on it is not an ad hominem since YOU did it.
And you’re the one using cheap obvious fallacies here like putting words in my mouth “the Tiananmen square massacre did not happen”
That CIA orchestrated failed attempt at destabilisation maybe was a massacre.
Seen pictures of many dead bicycles.
Unfortunately also from the lynched police from the rioters who infiltrated the protest.
One of the many things that OC was hidden in our oh so free and objective democratic western press.
I bet you haven’t got a clue the protest was about.
So before I get bored of toying with you, have you something of value and relevant to ad or only more platitudes?
You, digging up an irrelevant non-event from half a century ago, a fixation of the rabid anti-communist US imperialist propaganda machine shows who is in an echo chamber.
Imagine choosing a user name like that. LOL How fanatic must you be?
And so you have nothing meaningful to offer as I expected.
Better luck somewhere else, bye
You, digging up an irrelevant non-event from half a century ago, a fixation of the rabid anti-communist US imperialist propaganda machine shows who is in an echo chamber.
You’re the one who got fixated on it sweetheart. I just showed you an image of a lego figurine and offff you went. You guys are so easy to trigger. 😂
And so you have nothing meaningful to offer as I expected.
Says the twerp who is afraid to even answer a simple yes/no question about this so called “irrelevant non-event” from half a century ago.
You’re like the holocaust denier or flat-earther who is afraid to answer the obvious question because they know they will be ridiculed and deep down they know they’re wrong and have no arguments to defend themselves.
I said not interested.
And the other answers: “out-of-context, manipulative, anticommunist, CIA-sponsored atrocity propaganda” shows people know what you’re doing.
So calling you out on it is not an ad hominem since YOU did it.
And you’re the one using cheap obvious fallacies here like putting words in my mouth “the Tiananmen square massacre did not happen”
That CIA orchestrated failed attempt at destabilisation maybe was a massacre.
Seen pictures of many dead bicycles.
Unfortunately also from the lynched police from the rioters who infiltrated the protest.
One of the many things that OC was hidden in our oh so free and objective democratic western press.
I bet you haven’t got a clue the protest was about.
So before I get bored of toying with you, have you something of value and relevant to ad or only more platitudes?
No, you said I was lacking brains (sic). That is an ad hominem.
You know you are in an echo chamber right?
Oh honey 😂
You, digging up an irrelevant non-event from half a century ago, a fixation of the rabid anti-communist US imperialist propaganda machine shows who is in an echo chamber.
Imagine choosing a user name like that. LOL How fanatic must you be?
And so you have nothing meaningful to offer as I expected.
Better luck somewhere else, bye
You’re the one who got fixated on it sweetheart. I just showed you an image of a lego figurine and offff you went. You guys are so easy to trigger. 😂
Says the twerp who is afraid to even answer a simple yes/no question about this so called “irrelevant non-event” from half a century ago.
You’re like the holocaust denier or flat-earther who is afraid to answer the obvious question because they know they will be ridiculed and deep down they know they’re wrong and have no arguments to defend themselves.
jeez clown are you still here? not reading your BS, just blocking your annoying nonsense. You’re like some biblethumper