• Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The people setting those fires should absolutely be charged for their actions. But their actions don’t negate the Constitutional rights of everyone else who is protesting. And calling in the National guard before the local authorities have declared the situation to be out of their control, is a direct violation of Constitutional law.

      • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        But, when you say, “they”…you are painting the entire protest as violent, unless you make the distinction that it isn’t. And the vast majority of protestors are simply exercising their 1st amendment rights, in a perfectly legal manner.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          I never said they were violent, I haven’t heard of anything violent (edit: from the protesters) yet personally. There’s a difference between peaceful, not peaceful, and violent.

          If there’s enough bad actors doing things like setting cars on fire, then it warrants a larger police presence (but not the national guard at this level or ever the military)

          Edit: Just to add clarity, it warrants a larger police presence, because they are in fact no longer peaceful. Sure most people are, but the protest itself isn’t.