• 1ostA5tro6yne@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    rotten tomatoes is the worst indicator of whether a movie is any good, and “critics” are talking out their asses 100% of the time.

    • damdy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      You have to know how to use it. I know 80% audience and 40% critics will probably be a fun and interesting watch, but 70% critics and 80% audience will be a generic, well made but predictable movie that I’ll find boring. 95% critics 20% audience is arty and need to be in the right mood for. Etc.

    • slaneesh_is_right
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      You know, this thread kinda has me thinking. Younger people these days will never know what it’s like to just watch a movie and make up your own mind about it. Every movie is the best thing ever or a pile of garbage and you haven’t even seen the trailer yet.

      • 1ostA5tro6yne@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        nah movie reviews have been a thing since forever, before they were online they were on tv and in the newspapers. remember that fuckhead ebert being wrong about everything every single time?

      • 1ostA5tro6yne@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        what a weird comment.

        is this supposed to imply i don’t have taste?

        should i clap back about how you prefer to let paid shills tell you how and what to think about media?

        or should we notice that we’re in a thread about liking bad movies and maybe not make attacks on each others’ character in the most chickenshit-ass sideways manner in the name of defending some corpo website from flippantly vague criticism?