And no one is going to do a damn thing about this because the US is not a nation of laws anymore.

  • bampop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 minutes ago

    Inappropriate use of the presidential seal? Oh, he’s not walking away from this one!

  • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    21 minutes ago

    As long as the Department of Justice continues to work exclusively at the behest of Trump, you should expect no actual justice. 86 Pam Bondi, 86 Trump. 86 the Republican party for abdicating their oaths.

  • MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I do appreciate the media at least saying it. It needs to be widely said and acknowledged. Too often the media just ignores it and instead covers Joe Biden age.

  • apex32@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Just so you don’t have to read through the article to find out which law he broke this time: he used the presidential seal while he spoke at a private, for-profit event.

    • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Oh, yeah, of EVERYTHING he’s done, this is the thing that will finally land him in prison.

      • Sc00ter@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I mean, al capone was brought down due to some tax issue. Sometimes they gotta get a really good grip on a small thread and just keep pulling

        • MisterOwl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 hour ago

          2 very good lawyers had Donald dead to rights on election fraud and stealing government documents, and they both gave up when they realized the law doesn’t apply to him. There is no legal thread to keep a grip on that will ever make any difference.

          Nobody seemed to care when the supreme court gave us kings again. This is what it looks like.

        • Empricorn@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 hours ago

          al capone was brought down due to some tax issue.

          …and a government organization with the will to do what’s right and pursue justice. Do you expect to see that from the people Republicans and Trump put in place??

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Lol they gonna put him in prison?

    We all know what makes this stop.

    Somebody has to do it eventually.

  • Uranus_Hz@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Yeah. He breaks laws multiple times a day.

    We live in an authoritarian fascist state now.

    NOT hyperbole.

    • IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I’m over these headlines. The Supreme Court said he has presidential immunity. The law doesn’t apply.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        He has immunity for “Official” presidential acts. Establishing/ promoting a private business concern is NOT an official presidential act.

        • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 minutes ago

          The problem is that SCOTUS said two things:

          1. “Official” acts are basically whatever Trump says they are unless the Supreme Court says otherwise.

          2. Official acts can’t be investigated or used as evidence of criminal activity for unofficial acts. In other words, if Trump says it’s tied to an official act, it’s covered as well.

          In other words, Trump can do whatever the fuck he wants. All he’s got to say is that the whole thing was tied to his implementation of economic policy or something and it’s suddenly an “official act” that can’t even be investigated unless the Supreme Court says it can.

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        And you’re just going to comply with that?

        I for one would still want to call out whats being done, to make a record for future generations if nothing else.

        Are you really such a good little soldier that the supreme court makes a bad decision and you immediately reorient your entire moral framework to match?

        • ccunning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          50 minutes ago

          Lemmy loves the defeatist, resigned, comply in advance mentality. It pretty uniformly gets voted to the top.

          • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 minute ago

            And exactly what is your grand plan, oh wise one?

            Trump has been ignoring court orders left and right. Mass firings are still happening. Fired workers haven’t been rehired. Kilmar Garcia is still stuck in El Salvador. Immigrants are still being sent to third world countries with no notice or due process. Trump is issuing unconstitutional executive orders on the daily, and the Supreme Court themselves may very well rule that all of this is OK.

            Hell, Trump’s lawyers just argued in front of the Supreme Court that they will not abide by the Supreme Court’s decision if they don’t like it. SCOTUS judges didn’t even reply with any kind of threat of consequences for ignoring a SCOTUS decision. They just accepted that Trump may or may not ignore the court and moved on with questioning. Why? Because they know they have no enforcement mechanism. Neither do any of the other courts. Why do you think they’ve done exactly nothing but issue empty threats of some arbitrary and undefined “contempt” charges for DOJ lackeys if they lie to the court 20 or 30 more times? Because that’s all they’ve got. Anything beyond that and they’ll be exposed for having no enforcement mechanism when Trump tells them to go pound sand. The court’s threats have already been exposed as being about as effective as mommy telling a beligerent toddler that she’s going to count to three, but keeps stopping at two and a half, two and three quarters…

            And we all know how it works out. No punishment ever comes. Mommy eventually buys the screaming child the toy just to shut him up, and then wonders why he pulls another temper tantrum in the next store they visit. Same thing applies here.

            But hey, if you’ve got a viable plan besides taking an extra hit of copium and hoping for the best, I’d love to hear it.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        They said he has immunity for official duties. This article is about him using the presidential seal for non-official duties. I don’t think anything is going to happen still, but even the insane SC ruling doesn’t give him immunity for this.

        • Brandonazz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          The ruling outlined that official duties includes pretty much everything he does while president, unless he explicitly states it’s not in his capacity as president or for national interests, which he won’t do in court, so effectively, yes, he has complete immunity. The “official” part is just a fig leaf to give the ruling the appearance of jurisprudence.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Sure, but this is about him using the seal in a non-official capacity. Either it’s legal because it’s an official duty, in which case he doesn’t need immunity, or it’s illegal because it isn’t an official duty, in which case he isn’t immune.

            Again, nothings going to happen with this regardless. I’m just stating what’s going on.

        • IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 hours ago

          He’ll just say something like he was using it to build relationships with the leaders of other countries or some ridiculous bullshit. Unfortunately “official” while obvious to us may be more ambiguous to the law.

      • mriswith@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        At this point it’s basically just propaganda to give the illusion that something is being done.