• fluxion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    203
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Quickest way to mobilize the Democratic party is to threaten to put a progressive in charge

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      154
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      They learned their lesson with Obama. The funny thing is he’s not even a fucking leftist, the party is just so full of dinosaurs they think a modern centrist is a leftist.

      • WarlordSdocy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        57
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        With Obama they just learned how to take a somewhat progressive candidates and bend them into a moderate. It’s the same thing that happened with Kamala, although of course it’s hard to say if either were ever really progressive or if they just used that for votes and didn’t mind discarding it once they got pressured by the party and consultants.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            33
            ·
            3 days ago

            Neither was Obama. Not long after he put a bow on the nomination, he voted for an expansive security bill. A lot of people were surprised, but not me.

          • WarlordSdocy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yeah I definitely agree, both Kamala and Obama are candidates that acted progressive in their primaries but as soon as they eventually got the nomination they went towards the corporate Democrat establishment. My main question is whether they were progressive at some point but let themselves be changed by the establishment, consultants, and donors or if they never really cared that much to begin with. The end state is the same but the difference is important as it gives us insight into how much power the consultants and others have over candidates vs if they didn’t really care then it wouldn’t have taken much to change them.

            • Redditsux@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              3 days ago

              Kamala was picked as VP because Dems thought she would get votes from the republicans who aren’t so MAGA. She’s on the conservative side of things: tough on crime as AG, opposed cannabis legalization (changed position later), opposed abolition of death penalty (flipped later), etc.

              • Womble@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                I’m not even sure it was as deep as that, IMO they shoo’d her in without any chalengers as she could legally use the Biden-Harris bribes donations they had already collected. Thats about the extent of their thinking.

          • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            In general, no. In terms of specific policies as an AG, there were some.

            I’d say she’s a centrist, with some progressive policies and some regressive. Just my opinion obviously.

        • Flames5123@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          Obama wasn’t even somewhat progressive before the Democratic Party. He was against gay marriage for a while.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        The dinosaurs know they’re marching right, that’s where all the money is (for them).