• TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The first time I heard that many car manufacturers are getting rid of traditional buttons and odometers in favour of touchscreens, I already thought that it is dangerous.

    As always, corporations don’t give af.

    • Calavera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I don’t see an issue to have digital odometer because you don’t interact with it

      • nieminen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        For real, instrument cluster I’m okay having digital. It’s not something I need to touch, usually there’s steering wheel buttons to interact with it.

        Having your whole radio/climate/etc all on one screen with menus and shit is stupid. You can’t just reach over and change a setting without looking. I miss when everything was “analog”. My first car was a 91 mazda rx7, and I knew exactly where every control was, didn’t have to look at anything to operate it.

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    they already did a study that touchscreens are too distracting and dangerous, buttons are more intuitive and quicker to use, without looking at the menu.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I would also ban touch sensitive fixed controls. My father’s Avalon has dedicated controls for the HVAC but they’re touch sensitive, so you set the climate controls to 80C and full fan if you just wipe dust off the panel while the car’s on.

    You should be able to train your hand on the control, get a good grip on it, and then move it in such a way that a control input is realized. It shouldn’t have to beep at you to tell you it’s done a thing.

    I can turn the air conditioner in my pickup on and off by feel alone, same with the basic radio controls.

  • Damage@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I want to be able to replace my infotainment system without hassle or loss of functionality

  • sucius1@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Controlling everything in a car through screens is a safety hazard. It’s insane that’s even allowed.

    • HidingUnderHats@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I just bought a newish car and would not even consider any without physical buttons for climate. It really helped narrow the options, haha.

    • metaStatic@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      There are very few core controls and they should absolutely be physical.

      I hate screens as much as anyone but I honestly don’t think there’s much that can’t be put behind one.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Climate controls need to be physical, though.
        They are safety critical when your windscreen fogs over.
        Radio, too. For emergency broadcasts.
        And obviously any driving controls, like lights, indicators, cruise control, wipers, …

        Basically, anything that was present in a car 30 years ago needs to have physical buttons.

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Disagree about radio (if it’s really that urgent to receive an emergency broadcast you can pull over for a moment), but yeah the rest seem like it’s best to have physical controls for everything else.