• Ginny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    What is there to compromise here? Every building with gendered facilities has to build a third set of toilets for trans people? The government has to build a third set of prisons for trans people?

    • HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      An example of compromise would be to acknowledge that trans women are biologically different from cis women.This is not an extreme or hateful idea. Other issues like sports or bathrooms can still be nuanced discussions that acknowledge peoples concerns and work to educate rather then alienate. Acceptice means different things to different people and it wont come all at once.

      To compare a similar example imagine someone who comes out as gay to parents in the 90s: strict chrisitan parents might kick them out of the house and never speak to them again, - OR- they could be the type of conservative parents who say “well i dont agree with it but i still love you”. Whch would you rather have? Which one would potentially lead to a potentially better outcome/changed mind?

      It seems to me that completely alienating people who have reasonable objections to relatively new ideas is not the best way to go.