Original post: https://bsky.app/profile/ssg.dev/post/3lmuz3nr62k26

Email from Bluesky in the screenshot:

Hi there,

We are writing to inform you that we have received a formal request from a legal authority in Turkey regarding the removal of your account associated with the following handle (@carekavga.bsky.social) on Bluesky.

The legal authority has claimed that this content violates local laws in Turkey. As a result, we are required to review the request in accordance with local regulations and Bluesky’s policies.

Following a thorough review, we have determined that the content in question violates local laws in Turkey, as outlined in the legal request. In compliance with these legal provisions, we have restricted access to your account for users.

  • egerlach@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    For those who don’t know, Bluesky isn’t really federated. The only way to host a non-Bluesky instance required 1TB of storage in July 2024, and 5 TB of storage in Nov 2024. Could be way more than that now.

    You basically have to be a company to federate into the ATProto (Bluesky) ecosystem. You can’t just “stand up an instance”.

    Lots of detail: https://dustycloud.org/blog/how-decentralized-is-bluesky/

    (I know you’ve already realized that you were conflating Mastodon with Bluesky, I’m putting this here for others who come along so they can get the facts).

      • 73ms@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        yeah the DM system is something completely exclusive to their official servers and that they just rolled up without caring at all about trying to keep up the pretense of wanting to build something decentralized.

        • Natanael@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          They’re planning on migrating to the new MLS group messaging encryption standard, which is built to support federated messaging encryption (more efficient than the current Matrix protocol)

          (also, Matrix are also planning on adopting it, and the RCS spec is getting it too)

          It’s long to take a while though. The standard is very recent and nobody has a complete implementation yet.

    • aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      That’s only if you want to maintain a full archive. You don’t actually have to store a full archive to run a relay

      • 73ms@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        it keeps constantly growing by terabytes and needs to be fast too though. Means you’re going to pay more than most private individuals are able to long-term just for the privilege of running that one component.

        • Natanael@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          That’s just if you want a complete copy. You can choose to store only parts of it, and retrieve what’s missing from other relay servers when you need it.

          • 73ms@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            seems to be a fairly recent development that isn’t really documented much for now (not that running relays and some other components of the network is that well documented in general). Of course doing it that way also doesn’t help with how centralized the whole thing is…

            • Natanael@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              24 minutes ago

              It’s always been possible with the use of content addressing, it’s just that they’ve been spending most time building out core services and are now focusing on making it cheaper to run.

      • communism@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        13 hours ago

        It’s not an outlandish amount, but for instance I have my own VPS where I host a variety of services, and it still has under 1TB storage. Most hobbyists who rent a VPS would have less storage than that.

        • fishos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          My Jellyfin server is 6 times that… And my gaming PC is double that… Seriously, this person thinks 5TB is a lot? Don’t we have SD Cards/Flash Drives this big now? I’d be WAY more concerned about the bandwidth requirements.

          • 73ms@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            your home computers would probably not have the reliability or the disk performance required to run it.

          • AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            its still not a small amount of storage. and no, there’s still not really sd cards or flash drives bigger than 1tb, but obviously even if there were and they were super cheap, that would still never suffice as server storage. plus, if you’re hosting a node you’d want at least 4 or 5 times that storage to use a raid 5 or 6 array + at least one onsite backup, and one off-site backup.

            now we’re talking thousands of dollars in equipment just for storage, not the actual server itself, internet connection, etc.