data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4b51/e4b51d106fb9bb8cd79060155a195063f345403e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2f93/f2f939022ffae29e4decb326a98f4493d0a2e13e" alt=""
He would be a billionaire if he didn’t give so much away.
/s
He would be a billionaire if he didn’t give so much away.
/s
It’ll help for the legit abandoned.
Unfortunately for the developers trying to exploit the early access system we’ll either get half finished games released (maybe with a quadruple A warning), or monthly updates that do nothing more than change the version number.
Meanwhile;
“Musk’s son declares Trump isn’t real president, needs to ‘go away’”
Hmmm, maybe it should be:
“Musk’s son slams Trump as not real, needs to ‘go away’”
My favorite apple auto correct: changing the word before the one you just finished. You mentally verify that it’s correct, type the next word, auto correct fucks up the next word and then retroactively fucks up the word you already moved on from. Absolutely brilliant interface.
Hmmm, I wonder if they’re conflating processed foods and red meat again?
Yep:
Eating processed red meat (such as sausages, bacon, hotdogs and salami) was linked to a 16% higher risk of dementia and a faster rate of cognitive ageing. Eating about two servings of processed red meat a week raised the risk of dementia by 14% compared with those who ate less than about three servings a month. (A serving is a piece of meat roughly the size of a deck of playing cards – around 85g.)
If people substituted processed red meat protein for that found in nuts, tofu or beans, they could reduce their dementia risk by 19%, the study found.
A review of studies, published in 2023, found that people who ate lots of ultra-processed foods (of all kinds – not just processed meats) had a 44% higher risk of dementia
(Chicago) Mayor Brandon Johnson
Edit: Johnson, not Thompson, thanks.
https://chcoc.gov/sites/default/files/OPM Memo Initial Guidance Regarding DEIA Executive Orders.pdf
The full order, which provides the template this comes from.
The article is fairly good, the headline only really makes sense after reading the article.
Not a great headline.
Take the guaranteed income (at long as you’re alive), and go for a run with all your free time.
Zuck never cared to develop a following like Musk, so it makes sense that’s there is a not broad passive level of dislike.
Not surprised to see that the intense dislike is much higher for Musk though.