This is why “privacy” doesn’t work on a closed system controlled by a third party.

None of this seems to make sense. Also what does he mean when he puts his name in quotes and all caps?

Should have phrased it differently: Banning a post on a specific linux distribution is not a “ban on discussing linux” in general.

The linked article has a screenshot with a link to a post about openKylin getting removed. OP title is “Facebook ban on discussing Linux?” including the question mark. I don’t think it is accurate. At the same time I’m not defending Facebook in any way.

Discussing a specific linux distribution is not “discussing linux”.

Linking to a post on another website about a linux distribution isn’t either.

No thanks

Are a lot of people still buying teslas? The maga crowd doesn’t seem to like EVs that much, and anyone else might consider other brands more now that elon has joined them.

Why does former anything get it?

Mastodon or Lemmy, because you would have to choose an instance and a client. Threads, because why would you?

So what happened to San Francisco?