• 11 Posts
  • 133 Comments
Joined 6 years ago
cake
Cake day: April 17th, 2019

help-circle



  • Dessalines@lemmy.mlOPtoMemes@lemmy.mlChallenge level: impossible
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    George washington, franklin, jefferson, madison, all the founders were slave-owning colonizers who explicitly modelled their country after ancient Rome.

    It’s not a human problem, these were specifically evil people who did not share the same values as the people they murdered and enslaved.

    Most countries were not founded in this way.











  • The competition = efficient / spurs invention is mostly a myth.

    The peak period of US inventions, was from ~ 1930-1980, when it was forced (by the USSR’s rapid growth) to adopt a similar public-planning model, and allocate a ton of resources to public projects. This article gets into it.

    There’s also the book, The people’s republic of wal-mart, which isn’t the best, but it does contain one good argument: companies like Wal-mart and Amazon are many times the size of the GDP of even many countries, and they don’t compete internally, and use full-scale planning, with information provided at every level. It shows a few cases where companies tried to emulate the “compete = win” by splitting their company into many competing divisions, and of course the companies quickly imploded because of the massive waste of resources.

    Another good book on this is CJ Chivers - The Gun. It compares the history around the development of the AK-47 (which was collectively designed and had input from many state-level entities), vs the M16’s development, and how these two different development models affected their success.


  • Dessalines@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlLiberals
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 days ago

    With Vietnam I think the US protest movement played a significant role in the defeat(the docu Sir no Sir! has a good overview of it), less so with recent US wars. But that’s also due to the size and growth of the US police state, it’s imprisoning of activists, and it’s better ability to minimize the efficacy of protests.

    But ya I agree with the US rightward turn since the 1980s, it’s union and anti-war movements have been on life support. The historian J Sakai thinks that US unionism fully died by then (especially if you look at stats like strikes per year, which dropped to single digits).



  • Dessalines@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlLiberals
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 days ago

    ACA was a copy of a republican (mitt romney’s) plan, and it entrenches the parasitic middleman insurance industry and forces you to pay them, and them to accept you as customers. The US insurance industry is the largest and most useless money-sucking middleman in the world. In most countries this would be a far-right scheme, but its considered “progressive” by US standards.


  • Dessalines@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlLiberals
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 days ago
    1. Protests do work, in fact that’s how the US got all its amendments, and stopped the imperialist war on Vietnam. The important point, is that this takes place outside of electoralism / officially sanctioned actions within bourgeois democracy. Protests and activism also meet fierce resistance from US police, the domestic enforcers of capitalist rule, primarily because it’s outside of their rigged “vote for capitalist puppet” game.

    Nowadays liberals are doing their best to cripple the anti-war movement again by discouraging protests, and increasingly corral people into voting. They stood against the Iraq-war protests, just as they stand against pro-palestine protestors now.



  • Dessalines@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlLiberals
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Not voting is not going to help you achieve the goal of stopping this madness. It will only make it harder.

    You can only make statements like this, by ignoring history. People in the US have voted for 150+ years. This is the result.

    Again, if voting is working so well, why do things keep getting worse? Are they just not voting hard enough? No, it’s the system that’s broken, it’s theatre, a catch-22, a rigged game. Those of us who’ve studied US history and it’s class history learned this a long time ago. The liberals coming and telling us to vote to fix things, aren’t bringing any new arguments, and appear to us like fanatical zealots, who think that if they repeat mantras over and over, it cancels history.