He was racist scum and a fascist/imperialist sympathiser. In many ways he is one of the progenitors of the acceptable limits of anti-establishmentism in the so-called modern left of the West.
He was racist scum and a fascist/imperialist sympathiser. In many ways he is one of the progenitors of the acceptable limits of anti-establishmentism in the so-called modern left of the West.
On Orwell: https://redsails.org/on-orwell/
Implicit in their definition of white is the subjugation of the other, and therefore equality is perceived painful; the reduction of the exploitation of the other becomes a loss of a privilege and material benefits to the self, and this is true - the bourgoisie are class conscious.
This article is hilarious. I am not even sure who the target audience is meant to be -sinophobic liberals who know what dialectical materialism is? That seems very niche. Maybe it doesn’t have to make sense, maybe they were going for a word-salad vibes-based character-assassination.
Also the “shrodinger-style” attack; apparently Xi is both a very smart CPC president and also not able to explain dialectical materialism. Obviously no citations or proof offered for any of the allegations including the attacks of his higher education credentials.
The imperialist intelligensia must be getting more and more desperate as the contradictions of their parasitic economies draws on evermore deepening crises.
Addendum - I just saw someone else make a similar comment before me. I’ll just leave it here rather than deleting this.
For them, the only relevance in the 21st century worth fighting for is upholding the broken pretense of civility that is the barbarism and backwardness of the West.
The only “communists” they could be dragged into that void of murder are vibes-based, with the actual scientific socialists these liberals stutter and tremble before which is why they need to imprison and execute them the world over.