Mastodon

Have you ever considered that the Prime Directive is not only not ethical, but also illogical, and perhaps morally indefensible?

  • 314 Posts
  • 229 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle





















  • In “The menagerie”, pt 1, Kirk explicitly states he only met Pike the once when he was made Fleet Captain.

    I actually think this one is a fun way of playing with that established dialogue in an unexpected way. The actual exchange goes like this:

    MENDEZ: You ever met Chris Pike?

    KIRK: When he was promoted to Fleet Captain.

    MENDEZ: About your age. Big, handsome man, vital, active.

    KIRK: I took over the Enterprise from him. Spock served with him for several years.

    It’s entirely possible that “when he was promoted to Fleet Captain” and “I took over the Enterprise from him” are two separate events. And if that’s the case, then you might as well sprinkle in some additional meetings in between. I don’t think it’s the original intent of the scene in “The Menagerie”, but it’s a valid alternative interpretation.

    The Gorn thing is admittedly a bit tougher to explain, but I think it’s mostly a Kirk problem - Spock doesn’t really say anything to indicate whether the Gorn are familiar to him or not. And I don’t think Kirk has me the Gorn (yet) in SNW?




  • I’m sure more details will emerge, but:

    Under the legislation, someone who is certified or licensed to perform specific skilled work in a province or territory that wants to take on a job doing the same thing for a federally regulated project will be deemed to have met that federal standard.

    The government says recognizing provincial standards will open up job opportunities to workers and give employers a larger candidate pool to draw upon.

    The bill only recognizes provincial standards at the federal level. Workers certified or licensed in one province that want to work in another will only be able to do so when that province or territory agrees to drop their trade barriers.

    The federal government has rules and standards for businesses on top of regional requirements that apply across provincial and territorial borders.

    Under the legislation, provincial standards for goods and services will be recognized as having already met federal standards. That means a province’s organic standards for food, or energy efficiency standards for appliances, will be treated as having met federal standards.









  • regular folks

    I’m not even going to ask what your definition of that is.

    border authorities had the power to open any and all mail weighing over 30 grams, for at least the last 30+ years.

    And now that weight limit has been removed. It used to say, the Corporation may open any mail, other than a letter." Now it says, “the Corporation may open any mail.”

    It repeals the portion of the Canada Post Corporation Act that says, “Notwithstanding any other Act or law, but subject to this Act and the regulations and to the Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act, the Customs Act and the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act, nothing in the course of post is liable to demand, seizure, detention or retention,” and replaces it with, “Nothing in the course of post is subject to demand, seizure, detention or retention, except in accordance with an Act of Parliament,” which is a massive expansion of the circumstances in which it can be done.

    It also rewords the section on liability to ensure that there’s…no liability, for anyone, in cases where mail is seized.

    Bill C2 gives police the ability to search mail when authorized in order to carry out a criminal investigation.

    The bottom line is that these should be considered law enforcement activities, but there’s no warrant required. Just an “Act of Parliament.” There’s no probable cause defined here. Maybe you’re fine with that. I’m not.

    But let’s not sweat things right now. This was the first reading, and all points of the bill can (and will) be debated. Expect tweaks, repeals, and amendments.

    I agree with you to an extent on this one. But things are more likely to be tweaked if people make some noise.

    Even the original YT video under discussion here said that this bill contains some entirely unobjectionable things. But it also contains things that I agree need another look, and in fact are downright Trumpian in some respects.