In ruins would mean the streets and buildings have decayed past the point of habitability and usability. “Traces of a civilization”, ya know? We aren’t even close to that. I’m walking around right now. Living in a home. Words have meaning.
We do care. We are being usurped by the powerful and our traditional army has yet to make a move. It’s hard. I live in a diverse multicultural community. We preach tolerance and solidarity. You sound insane.
It’s Drake. A pop star and known pedophile.
You have no idea what’s going on. We aren’t in ruins. There aren’t traces. We are a civilization. And that person worded it poorly, they should’ve said tolerance.
Not really. We are all pretty connected in our communities. We just have a bad government.
Hey! Stop posting this pedophile. Maybe Reddit is more your speed.
What? This is nonsensical. I’m not alienated from my neighbors and community. A lot of us aren’t. Obviously the US is and has a civilization. You’re trying to redefine civilization and it is really not working. This is odd.
I randomly came across you and saw the tag I left you. Lol
“No you” really? Are you a child?
Lord have mercy.
User A stated that property damage is not violence.
User B expanded on that topic (not a derailment because it is relevant. A derailment would be them talking about another topic, example: music) and challenged the scope of different definitions of violence. You ignored this.
When you asked User B if they agree that property damage is violence, they stated their position that yes, it can be.
There are TWO different people, with TWO different opinions, and you are mixing them up.
Really? I came across you again. Still acting in bad faith, huh? The founder Eric likes his Pebble watches, and wants to make it again. What is with you and your lack of understanding? How hard is that to believe?
See? Still bad faith.
The other user elaborated to you on the importance of context. They challenged the definitions of violence. You basically responded “I was right” with very simple ideas. They didn’t admit anything later, because their position remained the same throughout. You saying otherwise is the bad faith part. It is okay if you don’t understand the complexities, but it is bad faith to misrepresent that other user.
See? Bad faith.
Based on your bad faith acting. Ya know, the whole conversation up above.
The initial claim was made by a different user. The user you’re talking about elaborated on the importance of context, so they didn’t contradict themselves.
With reading comprehension like that…
I tagged them as “bad faith actor”.
Removed by mod
You’re hostile to so many people who pointed out the obvious flaws in your logic.
I read your comments.
You’re incapable of self-reflection and incapable of admitting you’re wrong. Pathetic.
Removed by mod
Sadly this is true. I’m not sure what to do. All my options have failed spectacularly and I’m just one person.
Just stop already. You presented no facts about deputizing. You speculated, wrongly, and were corrected. You even mentioned the monkey paw, which is just nonsensical fantasy. The burden of communication lies on you. If you failed to convey your meaning then that’s your fault, not ours.
And we aren’t reading your other posts, we are reading here.
You’re being overly figurative. Our hegemony is ending. Words have meaning. We are fifty countries united into one. Our infrastructure isn’t failing nearly as much as you think.
Nation of immigrants = the US isn’t diverse. Lol
Okay. I haven’t traveled here extensively, you definitely know better. Please look up what a civilization is. I think you’re confused with civility. I suggest you get offline in the meantime. Bye.