data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4b51/e4b51d106fb9bb8cd79060155a195063f345403e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f048/8f048a66f46781c8f57ae24692b5b291aa05ec91" alt=""
3·
1 month agoI actually thought optical microscopy worked just fine at this scale.
I know it’s not the case for this photo, but if a 7 μm red bloodcell is reflecting red light (700nm, aka 0.7μm) under a bright white light, wouldn’t the smallest discernable detail of the red blood cells be about a 10th of its width? Is that not roughly the detail we have in this image?
I’m making an assumption that the distance between discernable parts roughly parallels the wavelength’s width. I could be wrong tho
12 days and 17 hours. As another commenter pointed out, checked with
uptime