The Dems being captured by capital was earlier in the article:

“One of the other concerns when I talk about oligarchy,” Sanders explained to journalist Robert Acosta, “it’s not just massive income and wealth inequality. It’s not just the power of the billionaire class. These guys, led by Musk—and as a result of this disastrous Citizens UnitedSupreme Court decision—have now allowed billionaires essentially to own our political process. So, I think when we talk about America is a democracy, I think we should rephrase it, call it a ‘pseudo-democracy.’ And it’s not just Musk and the Republicans; it’s billionaires in the Democratic Party as well.”

“Why are [the Democrats] held in so low esteem?” That’s the question that needs asking, he said.

“Why has the working class in this country largely turned away from them? And what do you have to do to recapture that working class? Do you think working people are voting for Trump because he wants to give massive tax breaks to billionaires and cut Social Security and Medicare? I don’t think so. It’s because people say, ‘I am hurting. Democratic Party has talked a good game for years. They haven’t done anything.’ So, I think that the Democratic Party has to make a fundamental decision, and I’m not sure that they will make the right decision, which side are they on? [Will] they continue to hustle large campaign contributions from very, very wealthy people, or do they stand with the working class?”

Well that’s at least an acknowledgement that they’re fucking useless and captured by capital.

In the prosecution of its purposes, the Slave Power has obtained the control of both the great political parties. Their recent nominations were made to serve its interests, to secure its supremacy, and especially to promote the extension of Slavery.

…

I hear the old political saw, that “we must take the least of two evils.” My friend from Ohio [Mr. Giddings] has already riddled this excuse, so that I might well leave it untouched; but I cannot forbear a brief observation. It is admitted, then, that Cass and Taylor both are evils. For myself, if two evils are presented to me, I will take neither. There are occasions of political difference, I admit, when it may become expedient to vote for a candidate who does not completely represent our sentiments. There are matters legitimately within the range of expediency and compromise. The Tariff and the Currency are of this character. If a candidate differs from me on these more or less, I may yet vote for him. But the question before the country is of another character. This will not admit of compromise. It is not within the domain of expediency. To be wrong on this is to be wholly wrong. It is not merely expedient for us to defend Freedom, when assailed, but our duty so to do, unreservedly, and careless of consequences.

-Abolitionist Charles Sumner, encouraging a third party vote in the 1848 election

Thanks, Democrats

Oh hey he was the government lawyer in charge of that case, neat

I’d be a lot more patient helping grandma along if I was gonna get ten thousand dollars out of it

Damn, modelo’s pretty tasty.

I agree! Prison would be a waste of resources, and they seem beyond reeducation.

I would simply throw them into a pit.

ONLY SIX?

Looks like the media is really glossing over their own role in consent manufacturing

Oh wow you’re right I never stop to appreciate basic breathing when it’s all working fine