In Canada it’s legal to download and watch content for personal use, so it’s when it’s shared that it becomes an issue.

Just like you could record anything with a vcr, you just couldn’t share it with your friends.

I feel like you just don’t actually know the definitions of the words you’re using here.

Don’t call someone stupid because you can’t explain your contradictory statements. You’re never going to, because they are contradictions. If every contract is a null and void at a sale, there’s no contracts to “extend” and how could you extend them ahead of time? It’s a sale, so you negotiate terms, than come back again for a sale? That makes no sense yet again dude.

How can you extend a null and void contract?

You’re contradicting yourself. I’m not confused, you’re just making no friggen sense dude because you’ve now stated multiple contradicting statements.

As specified in the term, that’s negotiated up front it doesn’t transfer. Not every contract stipulates that, and some do transfer… so there is precedence already.

You just said any sale automatically null and voids contracts, and now you’re saying it’s not and you have the option?

Sounds like a great and easy way to get out of contracts by selling yourself to yourself for $1.

Why would a contract be null and void due to a sale…? That makes no sense at all.

How could they refund automatically? Credit card info changes, lots of one time cards. People are happy with their purchase and have already moved on. I don’t get a refund on a book just because I’m done reading it and it gets pulled. The same expectation to be applied with a paintbrush is just silly.

If you’re active in the game, which would be the people that this affected, you would know about it.

The company says that if you made in-app purchases in January 2024 or later, you’re eligible to request a refund by contacting Apple Support.

Any purchases in the last year will be refunded. They haven’t just abandoned them.

Private prisons still operate under government oversite and with government founding….

And maybe having private prisons is its own issue entirely…?

That logic still makes no sense and is flawed at its basic starting point. A prison isn’t gonna raise money to get its inmates removed lmfao, they wouldn’t need money, they would just you know… let them out… fuck people are stupid and can’t think for more than 2 seconds.

And none of those people stopped to think for more than 2 seconds. That’s not even a valid line of reasoning.

A prison isn’t going to lease their inmates to a company that wants to get inmates released.

And none of that implies anything about it being “in a prison”

Critical thinking is a seriously lacking trait in today’s age….

You seriously thought a prison would lease its inmates to a company trying to release said inmates…?

That still doesn’t fit with the “in a prison” either.

Critical thinking is seriously lacking in this world.

… so they are using their money makers to get their money makers out of prison…?

Still makes no sense that way, it’s obvious inmates have nothing to do with it.

And what part of “at a prison” means work release anyways?

So they’re gonna raise money to release their money makers? Thats the hitch in the thought process here.

Are people really thinking the government would spend money to grow weed to get people out of prison?

Seems obvious that it’s not actually inmates.

??? Multiple people have told you the same thing……

Sounds like you don’t want to admit that you fucked up.

It sounds a lot like you’re the one who is ignoring definitions to bitch and moan 👋

Well sounds is a lot different than being factually incorrect and obtuse like you….

These were the poster boy devices each brand trotted out to show off their capabilities. These were flagships.

Phones in general are bigger, in each of those examples, smaller models also exist. The flagship isn’t the SMALLEST model, which is what you’re wanting since they are just bigger.

So how does that support your point? Lmfao.

You just don’t know what the term flagship is supposed to mean and are conflating it with other stuff.

Thanks for pointing that out so well!

??? Plenty of people are pointing the same thing out

It’s just you swinging this dude, and I’ve provided proof that you’re wrong, you’ve cherry picked a single definition and I provided multiple separate sources. As well had to explain how the minimalists phone still wouldn’t by definition ever be the “flagship” of its small and has no features.

As you said, just fucking google it. You didn’t just look at one source now did you…? When researching you must look at more than a single source. Thats just being obtuse lmfao. If you “googled” it and did any actual investigating you should have seen that the deification you picked isn’t the standard one.

And again, op has clarified their stance. The minimalist phone isn’t what they want/need so you using it as an example is just asinine and shows you missed the point completely lmfao. Give your head a shake bud.

As I explained previously, you’re cherry picking definitions to support your point.

Multiple other definitions that I provided you contradict that, and just repeating and saying the same thing doesn’t suddenly make it true. Even with minimalist phone, it doesn’t have all the bells and whistles, which is another important criteria and you’re choosing to ignore to make your asinine point.

A flagship has never been a cigar boat and that’s exactly what OP has clarified they wanted. So I was correct all along.

They used to make small flagships.

When??? You keep saying that, but flagships have always been large and fancy and never small and fancy. Can you provide an example? Because what it seems from every explanation you’ve made in this thread, you just don’t know what the term flagship means…

Sounds like you just need to learn words properly, the only one wrong here is you using an established term incorrectly and are conflating a small phone as a “flagship” which has NEVER been the case. Please provide an example of a flagship being small and compact, I would love to see how you came to fuck this well established term up so horrendously.

And no phone manufacturer has ever called their small phones their flagships, so for to OP to say they miss them, is them not actually knowing what the term is.

Can you provide an example of a phone that fits OPs definition as being sold as a “flagship”? Because OPs arguing for something that’s never been done before.

Flagships CAN be small, but it’s never been done in history before, still waiting for an example, I’ve asked twice now. Because OPs barking up the wrong tree. That’s the issue here.

You’re making this argument, while not providing anything to support it, I’ve even asked for a source to prove your point, all you’ve done is provide a definition that i then provided multiple that directly contradict the one you provided.

Flagship phones isn’t limited to some arbitrary sized companies.

In the history of the term, it’s never been a cigar boat dude…. It’s always the largest and fanciest, not the smallest and fanciest. Prove it dude. Step up or fuck off.