Dialectical Idealist
[W]e must recognize, and loudly proclaim, that everyone, whatever his grade in the old society, whether strong or weak, capable or incapable, has, before everything, the right to live, and that society is bound to share among all, without exception, the means of existence it has at its disposal.
- 16 Posts
- 15 Comments
7·2 days agoI agree with your point but we should avoid equivocating our words. The capitalists sees housing as a financial investment while we see it as an investment in the well being of the person/community. Housing may give a “return” on the productivity of the workforce, but we should house people regardless of financial incentive.
98% of Americans believe the top lines and thats why the ruling class goes through the trouble of lying to us.
Wealth of Jeff Bezos Shown to scale: https://eattherichtextformat.github.io/1-pixel-wealth/
What does the fork stand for OP
They’re so busy pointing out Republican hypocrisy they forgot about their own
That’ll be one bankruptcy, please
Bonus Meme:
Bonus meme:
You literally cannot make this shit up:
Ha! Well said
“Capitalism works!” - They say, ignoring the environmental destruction, the starvation wages, the rampant homelessness, and the millions of people murdered in the name of ever-increasing profits.
We can all agree on the dismantling of capitalism, class hierarchy, private property, the wage system, etc. But even for everyone else, the people who still believe in capitalism (somehow), it should be obvious that a winner-takes-all voting system where we vote for one of two parties is not even a facsimile of democracy. It’s depressing actually, at least Europeans have the illusion of many different parties working directly to serve specific interests.
Of course, from our more critical lens, it may seem like a moot point.
Ah, I see. The economic argument falls apart by its own terms. Fair point.