oh, i’m not blaming you, it’s actually always the same for me:
guess I’m just a dumbass :D
oh, there was a transcription I could’ve read instead of inspecting the image with a microscope :D
damn bro, you didn’t have to call out me like that
sounds like an unnecessary overcomplication tbh
it’s funny how there’s this kind of meme for every eastern-european contry. It’s not funny that i live in one, but still yet to meet a cute feminine boy:(
guess, you sould’ve kept your joke a bit simpler, stupider even :D
That’s why i said “arch-based” not “arch”. I don’t know about manjaro actually, lots of people on the internet complained how broken it is (or rather was broken, idk), so i decided not to try it. But i’ve tried and am currently running EndeavourOS. The installation process is as easy as the one of Ubuntu, while OS remains stable, despite me using AURs and manually compiled packages. AURs are far more friendly compared to PPAs. Not to mention the fact that i wasn’t always able to find the package i needed among PPAs, and manual compilation often did not work due to Ubuntu’s update model.
I don’t quite understand, what do you mean by “KISS is not available via pacman”, so please, elaborate. To me pacman is as simple to use as apt.
Also, didn’t know SteamOS is already available for public, good to know. Gonna try it some day.
what are the usecases for snaps and flatpaks in the home desktop environment anyway? What are their benefits? Isolation?
for me it’s snaps and the release model that suck. Also, apparently, arch-based distros are more noob-friendly, thanks to ArchWiki
Who tf is Steve Jobs?