data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4b51/e4b51d106fb9bb8cd79060155a195063f345403e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46069/460692bda71b4646fdb0a688218881341e90297a" alt=""
14·
18 days agoIn France the answer would have been: because otherwise there would be widespread demonstrations, strikes and eventually riots.
In France the answer would have been: because otherwise there would be widespread demonstrations, strikes and eventually riots.
Although hugely inefficient in both materials and energy.
It’s easy, you just add -ie to bourgeois.
The -ie ending is from French and is like a hand-wavy ending meaning “that lot”.
Happy to help
/s
You don’t have the highest immigration rates, and sometimes not even in absolute numbers.
The US has about 50 million total immigrants, or about 14 % of the population, that’s behind both Germany (19 %) and Saudi Arabia (89 %).
Considering why most of those people are fleeing their homes, the US might want to sit this argument out…