Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · edit-22 days agoIt's interesting that gun rights were sold on the basis of "resisting unlawful government." They seen to have caused and supported unlawful government.message-squaremessage-square150linkfedilinkarrow-up1617arrow-down152
arrow-up1565arrow-down1message-squareIt's interesting that gun rights were sold on the basis of "resisting unlawful government." They seen to have caused and supported unlawful government.Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · edit-22 days agomessage-square150linkfedilink
minus-squareshplane@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down2·2 days agoLet’s not get tied up in semantics but the idea that you can’t “accidentally” shoot someone is nonsense. Whether you call it negligence or not, if it’s not on purpose, then it’s an accident.
minus-squarebreecher@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·22 hours agoThey subscribe to the NRA falsehood about “guns don’t kill people etc.”. Such people are usually lost causes.
minus-squareArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 days agoAccident isn’t a harsh enough word.
Let’s not get tied up in semantics but the idea that you can’t “accidentally” shoot someone is nonsense. Whether you call it negligence or not, if it’s not on purpose, then it’s an accident.
They subscribe to the NRA falsehood about “guns don’t kill people etc.”. Such people are usually lost causes.
Accident isn’t a harsh enough word.