SSUPII@sopuli.xyz to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-22 days agofree thinkingsopuli.xyzimagemessage-square58linkfedilinkarrow-up1754arrow-down117
arrow-up1737arrow-down1imagefree thinkingsopuli.xyzSSUPII@sopuli.xyz to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-22 days agomessage-square58linkfedilink
minus-squareCrashumbc@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28arrow-down1·2 days ago120 is the minimum for above average. I wouldn’t consider it “high”. (Not ragging just being honest, I’m also in the 120’s)
minus-squareTartas1995@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 hours agoWell the average is normed to 100. So 120 is not the minimum for above average. The top 9% of population would be above 115iq. While high IQ is more of a diagnosis than anything, the statistics are real. I don’t know why you don’t want to consider top 9% as “high”. What is high in your opinion?
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up20·2 days agoHigh enough that you guys Do Not Work To Potential
minus-squarebrbposting@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 days ago most common thing in the world is unattained potential Didn’t somebody say something like that?
minus-squareinterdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 hours agoFinally I can feel good that my not-giving-a-shitism is common and normal
120 is the minimum for above average. I wouldn’t consider it “high”. (Not ragging just being honest, I’m also in the 120’s)
Well the average is normed to 100. So 120 is not the minimum for above average. The top 9% of population would be above 115iq.
While high IQ is more of a diagnosis than anything, the statistics are real. I don’t know why you don’t want to consider top 9% as “high”.
What is high in your opinion?
High enough that you guys Do Not Work To Potential
Didn’t somebody say something like that?
Finally I can feel good that my not-giving-a-shitism is common and normal