This screenshot is old (at least 12 years).

  • blarghly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Because trashy people never saw Austin Powers and updated their use of quotation marks to denote sarcasm.

    Quotation marks were historically used to add emphasis to text, the way asterisks are used today. Old people who refuse to change and don’t realize their way of writing is actively making fun of themselves still use them this way. These are also the people who watch Fox.

    • sfbing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Quotation marks we’re historically used …

      Meh. I am in my late sixties, and that was never proper usage. These people were merely always illiterate.

      • BatmanAoD@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It’s valid usage if you go waaay back, i.e. centuries. You also see it in some late 19th/early 20th century newsprint and ads.

    • BatmanAoD@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Scare quotes” definitely precede Austin Powers, though that may have spurred a rise in popularity of the usage. (Also, “trashy people never saw Austin Powers” is honestly a pretty weird statement, IMO.)

      That said, in this case, arguably the quotes are appropriate, because “the github dictionary” isn’t something that happened (i.e. a headline), but a thing they’ve made up.

      • Matty Roses@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, there was a whole Chris Farley bit with them. So you can figure where the end point of that is.

        Like most stuff with Mike Meyers, by the time he included it, it was kind of cringe.

    • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Scare quotes are used informally, but it’s not proper usage like a “news” channel should be doing. Which, fair enough, it’s Fox “News.” But it’s already larger text and all caps - why is more emphasis necessary?

        • BatmanAoD@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          No, because the thing they are naming is “The Github Dictionary”; they’re not applying scare-quotes to the word “dictionary” implying that what they’ve written is not really a “dictionary”.