• surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Is he saying they currently are violent?

    You’re so happy to imply one side but not imply the other. That’s a you problem.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Why would the other side need to be implied?

      You should not swear at people. It does not help in discussions.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        “we need to succeed” does not imply previous failure or success. You’re assuming it implies failure. That’s a choice of translation that you’re making and I disagree with it.

        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          It does when the current argument of the other side is that the protests. Bernie is not saying that there is no violencde but we should look out for it. He is explicitly denouncing violence playing right into the accusations.

      • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Is he saying they currently are violent?

        You’re so happy to imply one side but not imply the other. That’s a you problem.

        Where is the swearing?

        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          I didn’t say he was swearing, why would you think that?

          I simply advised him and said that swearing is not good in conversations because it does not help his cause.