• HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    If you find ths intresting, research “Kohlberg’s Stages of Moral Development” most people only achieve conventional moral development but many remain at pre-conventional until 40+ years old.

    One of the topics for child development (Which covers conception to death) I learned.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Mh. I think stage 5 and 6 are purely individual. In the end, morals depend heavily on cultural context. And morals serving morality only are hypocritical. Nothing good about someone killing themselves because they couldn’t save someone. And even this example depends on how close they were. Yet asians, who are culturally closer knit to their group and with more focus on family honor, often see that different.

      • HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        Very good points, yes. Stage 5 and 6 are individual and rarely develop, and none of it is a one size fits all, as vygotsky’s sociacultrual theory proposes, a persons cognitive development and how they put meaning to things, concepts and actions form from thier environment, society and culture. What we see as good or bad is dependent on our respective cultures, and can be easily hypocritical. Psychologically is a very intresting field because we dont have a definite answer on most things, the mind is textbook subjectivity.

        We are taught the 6 stages of moral development not as a fact but to provoke thought on moral development in context of concrete operational thought (Which itself has shown to be subjective) and how our modern psychological understandings stem from. however the first two stages give a fair idea of pre-concrete-operational moral reasoning, so we can better negotiate reason with children.