• Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    125
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Adalah, an Israel-based non-governmental legal organization that is representing some of the activists, said that those who remain are being held in Givon Prison in Ramleh, central Israel.

    So grab the passengers of a boat in international wares and jail them in Israel. 😒

    In a statement to CNN, Israel said that it “is preventing the entry of all vessels into the Gaza Strip, in accordance with international law.”

    Is there a charitable interpretation that could make this statement true?

    • Kirp123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      100
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      The ship was nowhere near Gaza. They were off the coast of Egypt in International waters. Israel just kidnapped a bunch of people. Also they only released Greta? What about the other people?

      • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        The others refused to be sent back to France, as they would have to agree to be permanently banned from Israel.

        • rumimevlevi@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          They refuse to sign a document saying that they enteres israel legally which make it look like israel kidnapping was legal and legitimate

      • GojuRyu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Greta is one of four activists that have been sent home. According to Israel only those four signed the papers neededfor it and the rest are expected to be sent home after a court have ruled they can. Basically the remaining 8 activists reportedly chose not to give Israel the easy way of getting rid of them. I don’t have any English news sources though, as I read it in a newspaper in my native language.

    • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Is there a charitable interpretation that could make this statement true?

      Since Gaza is an open air prison under the control of Israel and not recognized as an independent state we can blockade it all we want.

      Best I got.

      Really hard to justify genocide.

      • Randelung@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Palestine is not a recognized country in most of the western world, which in itself is a travesty, but you can probably infer a lot of bs from that.

        Like claiming a certain religious group has no human rights bc they’re not recognized as humans.

        • Kirp123@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Palestine is not a recognized country in most of the western world, which in itself is a travesty, but you can probably infer a lot of bs from that.

          That’s not even true.

          As of March 2025, the State of Palestine is recognized as a sovereign state by 147 of the 193 member states of the United Nations, or just over 75% of all UN members. It has been a non-member observer state of the United Nations General Assembly since November 2012.

          75% of the world recognizes Palestine as a sovereign state.

          • lividweasel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            To be fair, they specified “western world”. If you look at the map of countries that recognize Palestine, it’s pretty glaring that a good chunk of Europe, Canada/US, and Australia/NZ don’t officially recognize it.

    • neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      They declared war, they are allowed to enct vlockades according to international law.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        They declared war? So they recognize a Palestinian state and Gaza as part of that states territory? They recognize Hamas as the government of Gaza?

        Meanwhile the ICJ ruled that the blockade of Gaza amounts to a de facto occupation, well before Oct. 7. Furthermore the ICJ ruled that this occupation is illegal. So Israel is obliged to end the occupation, including the blockade as well as having the obligation to provide for the people under its occupation. An obligation which Israel also violates by the blockade.

        On top of that there has been multiple rulings of preliminary measures Israel has to take to prevent the risk of a genocide being committed against the Palestinian people. The key obligation again being unhindered access for humanitarian aid.

        Nothing of what Israel is doing is legal by international law.

            • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Page 898

              Outside the blockade area and on the high seas,34 belligerents relied on the practice of "visit and search"3s to stop vessels suspected of carrying “con-traband” to the enemy.36 A belligerent warship sailing on the high seas had the right to visit and search all merchant vessels. Merchants found carrying enemy contraband were captured and escorted to the belligerent’s nearest home port. The belligerent nation’s prize court then determined the fate of the captured ship and cargo.37 In cases where merchants resisted either capture or visit and search, the blockading force was entitled to pursue and, if neces-sary, damage or destroy the vessel to force the ship to submit.

              Page 901

              belligerents today continue to enforce blockades from long distance or through blockade zones. They do so because of three twentieth-century developments in maritime warfare: first, the growing importance to belligerents of conducting economic warfare in conjunction with armed con-flict;s3 second, the introduction of a large array of new weapons to the maritime battlefield; and third, the proliferation of modern weapons to less powerful nations incapable of conducting traditional blockade. In combination, these three developments have forced states to replace traditional blockade form with long-distance blockade or blockade zones.