• recall519@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    I just wish Google would stop overriding my passkey on Android for specific apps including their own.

  • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Passkeys are a great idea, but everyone involved seems like they want the process to be as much of a pain in the dick as possible. So until the industry pulls it’s collective head out of its collective ass (not going to hold my breath on that one), it’ll be passwords+2FA for me.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      It feels like everyone is trying to tie people to their platform. Oh, and also use the opportunity to force shit like “no custom ROMs or bootloader unlocking” on Android at the same time.

      • mke@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Are custom ROMs or bootloader unlocking an issue for the passkey ecosystem? Not something I’d seen commented on yet.

        • HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          You cant use it with grapheneOS, ive tried. I mainly use bitwarden for passkeys but some (most?) services only work with googles version

    • casmael@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      I hate 2fa so much, I never thought they would come up with anything more irritating. Little did I know.

    • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Jesus Christ, dude, that is exactly it.

      We’re trying to implement passkeys at work and the testing has been an absolute nightmare. Literally have no control over the onboarding experience because each tech giant is clamoring over each other, interjecting into the process to be the “home” for your passkeys. It’s bananas.

      When it’s all set up, it’s kinda great! But getting set up in the first place is an exercise in frustration.

      • lemming741@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        It’s a chance for them to lock you (normies) into their platform forever. They’re not going to give that up.

  • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    What’s wrong with passkeys? I’m in love with passwordless sign-in with yubikey, so much easier and faster than password + totp

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s shitty user experience when forced to dig out my phone to authenticate myself to a site I barely give half a shit about.

      Like I wouldn’t even have an account if it wasn’t forced, and now you assholes want my phone too?

        • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          Security for who exactly?

          If I don’t even want an account, it’s the “security” of the sites ad targeting data that IDGAF.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      I don’t like how there isn’t a nice, cross-platform and secure way to sync my keys. Not all services allow multiple keys to exist at once.

      • Semperverus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        The syncing of keys allows for much greater attack surface.

        Its being worked on right now but the standard hasn’t been finalized yet.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          Until exporting and syncing keys is properly implemented, passkeys can go kick rocks.

  • SleafordMod@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    I have no idea what a passkey is and I will probably only learn what it is when they become mandatory

    I will just use passwords + 2FA for the moment

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    There’s been a lot of pain in the attempt to portray it as “Just click the passkey button, and that’s it! Your login is secured for life!”

    No - Buddy. It is secured for this one specific device that I have biometric authentication for. What about my computer? What about my other computer that isn’t on the same operating system? I have a password manager that stores these things, why didn’t you save to that when I registered? Why is it trying to take this shit from my Apple Keychain when it’s in Bitwarden?

    And, the next ultra-big step: How would a non-techie figure this shit out?

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      And, the next ultra-big step: How would a non-techie figure this shit out?

      They wouldn’t, because the people calling the shots in the tech world create UX with a focus on it sucking for everyone

    • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      For some people it is that easy.

      When it is saved to a cross-platform password manager, it is secured on all devices that password manager runs on including your computer on other operating systems. You can also choose other in the OS prompt & redirect to a device with your passkey or use a hardware security key (I don’t). If your preferred password manager isn’t the primary one on all your devices, then fix that or use the other option mentioned before.

      How would a non-techie figure this shit out?

      The same way they figure out passwords & multifactor. Their pain isn’t ours for those who’ve figured this out & have a smooth experience.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        I mentioned Bitwarden in my comment, and my frustration specifically comes from occasions that I had Account X ready in Bitwarden, started up an app that relied on Account X, but loaded an HTML login page that had no discernable controls to use that Bitwarden passkey; expecting entirely for it to exist in my Apple keychain, which I never use.

        I think it’s very easy to claim this specific app / account was not implementing passkeys well. But if that’s the case, how can I guarantee any other accounts I move over won’t fuck it up somewhere? I haven’t seen anyone get the concept of passwords wrong, and even if they don’t understand how managers work, I have control of the copy-paste function and can even type a password myself if needed.

  • Boozilla@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Remember when tap-to-pay was new and didn’t work at a lot of places and some people were freaked out over it?

    And now most of us use it without a 2nd thought.

    I speculate passkeys will be like that.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Passkeys are light years ahead of 2fA in user experience. Why do you dislike them?

    Security based on devices is one of the positive innovations of smartphones and perhaps the only area where they’ve improved over the desktop experience.

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      I very specifically don’t want my security tied to my device. Trying to migrate to new phones, and keeping things synced between a phone, desktop, and laptop is why I long ago moved to a password manager. Now, especially in the phone space, getting passkeys to function fully with a password manager ranges from “pain in the ass” to “not actually possible”.

      • Quokka@mastodon.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        @IrateAnteater @yesman if they do the “show secret” or whatever the option is called when your 2FA setup shows a QR code then you can copy that plain-text and save it somewhere (safe!) to just plumb it in to whatever authenticator app you decide to use elsewhere.
        If you use something like BitWarden then it can generate those 2FA codes for you and sync between whichever devices you use.

      • Wanderer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Heard of so many people losing their phone. Then they try to log into something and the company (quite often google) says “I don’t give a fuck if you know your passwords I’m never letting you log into your account get fucked, don’t call I won’t answer”

      • thesohoriots@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        I had a botched phone battery replacement once resulting in the phone getting replaced very unexpectedly. It was a nightmare trying to get everything back together because I stupidly used google authenticator, which is tied to the specific phone it’s on. Not tying it to the device is the way to go.

        • yesman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          I didn’t consider the friction of integrating it into your existing process because I use a manual password manager. But who is saying you should replace a password manager with passkeys? It was always meant to be a parallel system.

          Edit: I just wanted to add that people like you and I who have “solved” our credentials problems are a tiny minority. Passwords are shit. Just because we’ve grown accustomed to them doesn’t change that.

          • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            You’ll find that nobody has a problem with passkeys specifically. They have a problem with the implementation, and companies forcing passkeys onto users who don’t want or need them.

            I don’t need passkeys because I use a password manager. My threat model requires that I can restore my password manager, all 2FA, and regain full access to all my accounts from anywhere in the world, even if a natural disaster occurs and all my devices are destroyed.

            Passkeys and SMS 2FA are a direct threat to my threat model, and I can’t help but feel they’re designed to further entrench surveillance capitalism, and the invasion of privacy as a prerequisite for security.

  • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I’ll use banks as an example

    If they cared about your security there would not be a mobile app or website.

    Hell, credit cards would still require a signature.

    It’s about cost first and foremost and then convenience.

    Has nothing about you as a consumer. They don’t give 2 shits about you as a consumer.

    • candybrie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Do you think signatures were at all secure? If they cared about security they’d do chip+pin like most civilized countries.

  • tabularasa@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    The amount of people in this thread that don’t understand passkeys surprises me. This is Lemmy. Aren’t we the technical Linux nerds of the Internet?

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      2FA is just dead simple. I contact you, you contact me, handshake achieved. If you call me out of the blue I raise the alarm. If you get a login attempt with a failed handshake you raise the alarm.

      Putting it all behind a pop up screen just isn’t trustworthy to the human brain.

        • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          2FA is not SMS. SMS is the least secure, shittiest, and simplest form of 2FA, designed as the bare minimum for the average chucklefuck. Everywhere implemented it hastily because the average idiot still uses the same password for everything. It should be illegal as the only form of 2FA, but our governments are run by criminally corrupt dinosaurs.

          Fun story! Back in 2017 I tried to remove SMS 2FA entirely, and switch to a data only mobile service. I use 2FA everywhere it’s available, but was able replace SMS with TOTP everywhere except banks, even on big tech platforms where you could only activate TOTP after adding a mobile number and enabling SMS 2FA (you could then remove the mobile number). I ultimately had to keep the voice service because banks required SMS 2FA, with no alternatives beyond their own custom 2FA apps, that can only be registered by SMS. Almost a decade later I have more SMS 2FA than ever before.

          The moral of the story is we live in a clown world capitalist dictatorship.

  • darvit@lemmy.darvit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    ITT: people who think only SMS, email and TOTP exist as 2FA.

    And people who think only your phone can be used as passkey.

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      When those are the only options given by some services, yeh it kinda is. I’d love to be able to just use my flipper as a u2f for everything, but unfortunately most websites are all “no” and you have to use a chrome browser instead of Librewolf even when you could use a yubikey, so fine I guess text me, oh whoops I changed my number and I’m now locked out of my acct, cool.