• daddycool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It’s not my joke, so I couldn’t care less. I’m talking about jokes in general and the fact that you don’t understand how it works.

        • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          No, I’m just saying you’re wrong.

          Based on what expertise? Which criteria do you apply?

          That meme is incorrect, and therefore it doesn’t land for me and a lot of other people. You cannot say “you’re wrong” on that.

          • daddycool@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            You said it wasn’t a good joke, because one can easily poke holes into it.

            This is not correct. Being able to easily pick apart a jokes doesn’t automatically make it bad. Lots of good jokes will not pass that test either.

            You not liking a joke based on that logic, is on you alone. But it’s not an universal rule of jokes. Do you think you’re some kind of authority or something?

            • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              No, it’s an observation I made often enough, that factually incorrect jokes don’t land and get picked apart.

              I’m tired of this though. If you are satisfied with stupidity, fine. Keep laughing about dumb shit then. I’m out.

              • daddycool@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Well, it’s factually correct that I’ve been having a laugh at your expense, so analyze that any way you want.