Luis von Ahn says criticism over strategy change shows ‘anxiety’ about technology replacing jobs
Archived version: https://archive.is/20250608171624/https://www.ft.com/content/6fbafbb6-bafe-484c-9af9-f0ffb589b447
CEOs are rich enough to live in their own delusional bubble. They are very out of touch with the average person, or their own workforce. This is nothing new.
Cancelled my sub when I found that out. Switched to busuu, comparing the two, busuu and Duolingo seem to have different teachings and I noticed that my ability to understand things (comments) in duo is slowly becoming paywalled on the pro(paid) version… Wtf??! Quality of lessons is also seemingly going down.
Then I heard they are handing user data to ICE (maybe this is a rumor) but it just pushed me away even quicker.
Try Language Transfer. It’s a very different approach from rote memorization.
They don’t appear to be sharing any data with ICE. The Mozilla Foundation issued a report saying defence contractors were assembling dossiers from publicly available data, including duolingo data.
https://cyberinsider.com/mozilla-calls-for-action-to-stop-surveillance-firms-data-scraping/
Lemme rephrase that for ya mate:
“I did not anticipate people getting angry that i turned the program into a complete steaming pile of useless shit”
It’s not the children who are wrong.
CEOs are overall just not smart and we need to stop that belief
Is there really a single person of this belief, after the whole HBO name-change stupidity? That is still among the worst business and branding decisions I have ever seen.
“Well if they are so dumb why do they have so much money???”
I would argue that it is one of the most deeply held American beliefs even if it’s not talked about openly. Successful people are almost always viewed as intelligent by default. Despite all evidence to the contrary.
People STILL call Elon a genius ffs
„AI is creating uncertainty for all of us, and we can respond to this with fear or curiosity.“
How about we respond to this with reason?
Of course he didn’t expect the blowback. All of the CEOs are in their own little worlds trying to figure out how to make money off of AI. They’re all taking their personal money and investing heavily in AI corporations, so they’re all very pro AI and couldn’t understand why your average person who is pretty sure it’s going to make their life worse through jobs or other means would be anti-AI.
Luis von Ahn says criticism over strategy change shows ‘anxiety’ about technology replacing jobs
Motherfucker, you’re the one that fired slews of employees to be replaced by text-prediction algorithms. It’s not “anxiety”, you’re fucking doing it.
Yeah, he learned nothing. He’s just upset that everyone didn’t agree with him.
He’s going to keep pushing the same nonsense as soon as the attention blows over, and he’ll be just as surprised when it goes bad.
Fire that CEO, he’s an idiot.
Better yet, replace them with ai. Don’t need to pay someone 300x of an average workers wage just to take bad decisions
If you have ever been to any major SLT or higher meeting, the phrases “This is the first time I am hearing about that” or “That’s not what was reported to me” come up so much that I’m amazed the meetings even finish on time. Plausible deniability of the name of the game.
I said “I sent a video recording of this a month ago and received confirmation. Do you not have that?” and got back “I never got that.”
“Alright, got it. Thankfully it’s not my problem anymore but you know where yours is.” and left it at that.
That’s true and this is not an example of such a situation, because he knew exactly what the reaction was going to be. He probably felt that he could ride that AI bubble away from it, but he knew the reaction was waiting for him.
The other thing about that claim, when it could possibly be credible, is it means that essentially the boss is not qualified to do their job. The one thing they should have done is been chatting with ordinary workers or customers to see what the actual needs are, and they’re admitting it to somehow deflect from a bad decision they made but in doing so they’ve unwittingly shown that they’re basically incompetent at their entire job.
I think you misunderstood my meaning. They know. They’ve known all along. They simply think that saying they don’t know and throwing everyone below them under the bus is fine because it’s accepted in the business culture here. The CEO is always right because even when they aren’t, bonus still gets deposited.
Still not installing it, Luis.
AI could easily replace ceos
Seriously - LLMs are much more adequate to do a CEO’s job than an engineer’s. Maybe the crazied scramble to push AI “features” into products is to distract customers, workers and shareholders from this fact?
I Uninstalled. And use Memrise now, it is very fun with video of people to understand the word better
I also made the switch to Memrise. Its great! Actually a platform made for learning and not just a game disguised as learning.
They also have an option for a lifetime purchase instead of a running subsciption, which I am a huge fan of.
”I’m out of touch with reality” - another dipshit rich guy.
It’s hardly surprising that these people are out of touch when they’re constantly surrounded in a bubble of yes-men, cultish AI sycophants, VC investors and other “dark enlightenment” enthusiasts.
It’s a pathology, really. A kind of shared delusion in service of global capital.
christ i hate the term “dark enlightenment” more and more it’s being used to be an “inevitable” and romanticised spin to reactionary bullshit, stupidity and panic
That’s a plain and simple admission that you are incompetent at your job. You should resign not post puff pieces at FT…
I feel like the only job AI would be better suited at would be CEO.
I mean, they take in current hype, change a few words and then regurgitate it with slightly different words.
Nah let him keep it longer. I think the company sales can go lower
Anti-human little creep, I uninstalled and cancelled my subscription as soon as I heard the news
