• MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    22 小时前

    I’ll make a complementary argument below in a sec, but “enforcing driving traffic” seems like a feature, not a bug.

    For how testy people get about crawling for copyrigted stuff for things like AI, everybody seems super chill about search engines and aggregators ripping off content at industrial scales with zero repercussions.

    • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 小时前

      Tbh, I’d be less testy about bots scraping my sites for AI input IF they respected my robots.txt file and didn’t slam the server. They’re just rude and I don’t like it. Sometimes they’re so rude it’s effectively a DOS attack.

      Tbh, my sites exist to get information out there and I don’t care if someone mirrors my sites, as long as the information is still accurate.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 小时前

        I mean, that’s great and you’re well within your rights, but that’s not what people generally say when they express outrage about AI scraping. People straight up call it theft very often and seem to consider using online content for training is the equivalent of copying or distributing it.

        Which stands out to me because that was not what happened when the EU decided that Google News was effectively piracy after a whole bunch of news outlets complained. The consensus there seemed to be that it was a bummer to lose the service despite all the scraping.