• boonhet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Probably because you might end up giving birth prematurely on the flight and they don’t wanna be liable for anything

    • Obi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The liability thing is definitely part of it but it ain’t good news for anyone involved if that thing decides to pop out over the Pacific.

        • kungen@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          2 days ago

          Only the Americas have jus soli really. Everywhere else it’s the parents’ citizenships that matters.

              • squaresinger@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                Jus soli is important for former colonies, especially those with large permanent colonist populations. It’s an easy way to build an immigrant-based citizenship.

            • Raltoid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              There are a bunch of regulations to make sure that in most cases a US citizen giving birth abroad, will grant their kid US citizenship. Although the law does not “guarantee” it like it does in most countries outside the Americas.

              “Interestingly” the US does tend to apply jus sanguinis over jus soli in case of stateless people.