Liberalism is when you believe in voting against fascism to lessen the burdens on engaging in actual leftist action, I guess.

Extremely dire turbolib statement here, RIP

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
    2110·
    3 days ago

    This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won’t be tolerated.

    and

    This is an anarchist comm. You don’t have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We’re not here to educate you.

    But I think I should make the rules more explicit about liberal electoralism brainrot.

    EDIT:

    Here’s a more explicit rule for you. but as always the FAFO is in effect for the next time you think something is not explicit enough.

    No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can’t control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.

    • Universal Monk@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      94·
      2 days ago

      No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can’t control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.

      Love this!

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      173·
      3 days ago
      • Goes inside an anarchist space
      • Calls all anarchists stupid for not voting for fascists
      • Gets banned for breaking the rules

      Yep, it’s a PugJesus moment. “Vaguely leftist”.

      So much for “I don’t get a thrill out of debates.” I wonder how long PJ will complain about db0 like he did with blahaj.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
        711·
        3 days ago

        Gets banned for breaking the rules

        As is pointed out, no rules were broken, but I guess that’s a level of reading comprehension above where you usually operate.

        So much for “I don’t get a thrill out of debates.”

        Literally already clarified this for you, but I understand that comprehension in general isn’t your strong suit.

    • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
      148·
      3 days ago

      I figured you might come in here with some well mannered annihilation of op. Pleasure to read it. Thank you for your service.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      814·
      3 days ago

      “Harm reduction is reactionary” and “If you believe in harm reduction, you don’t understand what anarchism is”.

      Classic.

      At least now you’ve added an actual rule, instead of just banning people for hurting your feelings by [checks notes] arguing that inaction against fascism isn’t morally acceptable.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        148·
        3 days ago

        Imagine believing that voting for the people who brought us fascism (aka fascists) is “harm reduction”.

        Peak lib delusions.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
          810·
          3 days ago

          Of course, the lives of marginalized groups don’t matter to ‘anarchist’ LARPers. Harm reduction is unacceptable because it doesn’t lead to a good society in and of itself. Who cares if a few million minorities more or less suffer and die?