It used to be that if we saw an art piece or a cartoon, we would know someone made it for a reason. Even if it was a miscommunication or accident, it had an original intent behind it. It could have even been the deliberate lack of intent. I guess the closest to AI would be drunk/druggy art, but that usually has some kind of learned intent sneaking in.

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think art can also just exist, and doesn’t need a message behind it.

    Absolutely, that’s why I posted the video of Jackson Pollock. His art looks like a mess until you see him painting it. He’s kind of dancing or meditating. It can just be the experience of doing the art that is the intent.