Thank you for replying, and I did find it at the bottom of the thread after replying. Unfortunately, I believe this will get harder as the number of incidents and pictures increase, and I believe there will be bad actors and bots taking advantage of that fact in the future as well.
This was posted as three children zip tied, but the article captions it as at least one because it looks like it might be only the oldest cuffed. It may be (probably is) totally unreasonable for that young man (could be anywhere from 10-18 by that picture, and I am not giving the benefit of the doubt to ICE) to be cuffed, but the OP implying all those children were zip tied could very well be sensational over exaggeration if there isn’t context backing that up.
I’m a bit confused and maybe something got lost in translation. A picture was posted of something questionable that appears to be a bad thing, with the poster of said picture saying it’s even worse than what the picture shows. You told someone to look at the context for why it is indeed as bad as the poster said, but someone asking about the context you referred to/found is, is a bad thing/downplaying?
Sorry for talking too much? Don’t use Google because fuck the monopoly, Duckduckgo has other instances when searching for ICE handcuffing kids. Next time I’ll just ask for the sauce instead, or just not bother since that seems to be the preference.
Are you trolling?? The problem is obvious… you saw a child tied up and, instead of being mad about it, just scratched your chin and played devil’s advocate claiming there must be a reasonable explanation.
There is no reasonable explanation for treating children this way. And if you think even for a second that there might be, you’ve fallen for their game.
There is no debate about this. Don’t let yourself be fooled into thinking there is.
Thank you for replying, and I did find it at the bottom of the thread after replying. Unfortunately, I believe this will get harder as the number of incidents and pictures increase, and I believe there will be bad actors and bots taking advantage of that fact in the future as well.
This was posted as three children zip tied, but the article captions it as at least one because it looks like it might be only the oldest cuffed. It may be (probably is) totally unreasonable for that young man (could be anywhere from 10-18 by that picture, and I am not giving the benefit of the doubt to ICE) to be cuffed, but the OP implying all those children were zip tied could very well be sensational over exaggeration if there isn’t context backing that up.
deleted by creator
I’m a bit confused and maybe something got lost in translation. A picture was posted of something questionable that appears to be a bad thing, with the poster of said picture saying it’s even worse than what the picture shows. You told someone to look at the context for why it is indeed as bad as the poster said, but someone asking about the context you referred to/found is, is a bad thing/downplaying?
deleted by creator
Sorry for talking too much? Don’t use Google because fuck the monopoly, Duckduckgo has other instances when searching for ICE handcuffing kids. Next time I’ll just ask for the sauce instead, or just not bother since that seems to be the preference.
deleted by creator
Are you trolling?? The problem is obvious… you saw a child tied up and, instead of being mad about it, just scratched your chin and played devil’s advocate claiming there must be a reasonable explanation.
There is no reasonable explanation for treating children this way. And if you think even for a second that there might be, you’ve fallen for their game.
There is no debate about this. Don’t let yourself be fooled into thinking there is.