• aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 天前

    They were never building that, let’s be honest.

    Edit: rural broadband is like the new affordable housing, high speed rail, or better public transit… It’s something that’s completely possible to do but they’ll always find some excuse to do nothing so they can campaign on it again next cycle

    • Glitchvid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 天前

      It was basically up to the states this time around, they could allocate BEAD funds more or less as they wanted and absolutely build fiber out to the vast majority of residences (look at North Dakota, it’s evidently possible) through models like municipal fiber.

      Ultimately it’s a political issue more than anything else, Americans just can’t get anything done anymore, politicians would rather enrich themselves and voters only care about the culture war.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 天前

      Every single time the land line ISPs have gotten money for rural broadband, they use it for something else and don’t build anything. Starlink actually built a network that works. Many places have gotten decent 5G home internet too.

      I have been promised fiber for over a decade yet the only wired connection available is a DSL network that’s been so poorly maintained that it barely even functions.

      • RedPostItNote@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        7 天前

        Do you mean works or falls out of the sky routinely to litter the earth? We build lots as far as smaller ISPs go. You just don’t have any idea what you’re talking about.

        • cole@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 天前

          Starlink is designed to demise on re-entry. It’s a core criteria.

            • cole@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 小时前

              It means it burns up on re-entry and doesn’t litter the earth

                • cole@lemdro.id
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  19 分钟前

                  I’d love to hear more about this conspiracy theory, can you elaborate?

                  I think it’s hilarious that you think some Starlink satellites AREN’T designed to burn up. They all will, someday.