• RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    4 days ago

    Cutting the top tax rate in 1983 actually increased tax revenue. A 91% rate is too high and encourages tax avoidance and evasion

    • gadfly1999@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      And now that it’s lower the billionaires are happy to pay their fair share and society is better off for it. /s

    • brendansimms@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      Do you have a source for that? I found this source that is citing data from the congressional budget office. SOURCE (I followed the link and did confirm the numbers match). I made a quick plot so it was easier to see trends. Nothing stands out to me about 1983 - there’s a small dip and then a course correction back towards the upwards trajectory, but this data tells us nothin about wealth inequality. We can’t use total values because of inflation and such , probably have to use revenue as a %GDP or something but I’m too lazy too keep searching at the moment :) My immediate thought looking at the plot is this: If the total tax rev kept going up, and the top tax rate was cut, then the increased tax burden must have shifted to the poorer classes; I’d have to verify but it seems like a logical conclusion.