• Zorque@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 天前

    No, that’s literally whataboutism. It’s saying the merit of their accusation is based on their history of doing that thing rather than evidence of who they’re accusing of doing it. Fairly typical ad hominem attack.

    • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      4 天前

      No, it’s not “whataboutism” because the source of the accusations is extremely relevant. The US and our allies lied about Iraq and Afghanistan to justify our invasions, and got all of the same western media outlets that are cosigning our accusations towards China did the same with those confirmed lies. We have a verifiable history of lying about other counteies to justify our foreign policy, and we have extremely obvious motive to lie about China right now. Pretending that’s not the case doesn’t help your credibility.

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 天前

        Right! You can cast doubt on their honesty by pointing out that they have lied before. That’s called evidence.

        However, saying they do the same thing as the other guy is not evidence of them lying. That’s whataboutism and ad hominem.