• njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Glad they finally put a nail on that one. You got to stop funding projects made by people who don’t even like the source material.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Bond and Dexter improved by straying from the source material (up to a point). Bourne trilogy is better for ignoring the disguise element.

      But in general you are correct.

      • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Good point.

        I thinknwe could say those creative teams still clearly love their source material, even as they deviated from it.

        A great adaptation feels like a valid alternate take on the original story, rather than expressing complete disdain for the original story.

      • anonymouse2@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think to know where to deviate from source requires a thorough understanding of and appreciation for it first.

      • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I think the Watchmen movie is the only example I can think of where deviating from the source material was actually a good thing. Even then, it was a tempered change that still captured everything else about the comic, and they didn’t try to “fix” anything else.

        You don’t make a successful book-to-movie project that makes millions of dollars by shitting on the source material that already made millions of dollars. Hollywood writers are egotistical assholes that do not make millions of dollars. The book was successful for a reason. Don’t fuck up a good thing.

        • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          I agree with your point, but the lack of

          spoiler

          dead fake space squid

          was still a silly, unnecessary and confusing change. It completely lost the critical “look out, they are coming for you from space” aspect, which is the only way his plan might have worked.

          • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            29 minutes ago

            Say those words in the spoiler out loud, and you’ll see how silly and ridiculous the concept was, especially to modern audiences.

            • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 minutes ago

              I agree. But comics are weird. (And comics movies need to risk being equally weird, to be good.)

              If they had to replace it, I think they still should have picked a replacement that actually still somehow implied

              spoiler

              an extra terrestrial threat to humanity.

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Man I don’t think I could disagree with a comment more. He captured nothing about the comic. He missed the point entirely.

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Can you expand? I thought it was pretty much shot for shot, except the exchange of common external enemy and exclusion of pirates.