• Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    19 minutes ago

    For what it’s worth: this was apparently a concept created by an airline seat company called Aviointeriors who showed the idea off at trade shows in 2010 (as the “SkyRider”) and 2018 (as the “SkyRider 2.0” pictured here.) Pretty much all the news articles about it are about Aviointeriors claiming vague unsourced “plans” for them to be adopted by some future date, steeped in Aviointeriors’ corporate PR speak, but the articles mostly end up being about the intense public backlash to the idea. No airlines have announced any plans to buy and use these seats, not even those lunatics at RyanAir, and in the years since all SkyRider mentions have been quietly removed from Aviointeriors’ own site.

    Sources:

  • ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 minutes ago

    I don’t get it. Why not just have bunk beds and everyone gets to lay down like those sleeper busses in Asia. They get way more people on those busses than with just seats

  • Manticore@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Standing still in place for a few hours is waaay more uncomfortable than pacing and walking around. Shifting the weight on our feet really helps

    I can’t imagine how awful these would be, especially with how cramped they’d be packed in (otherwise they’re no smaller than chairs). God, you couldn’t even bend down to scratch your knee.

    I remember seeing pictures like this a looking time ago so I’m pretty sure they’re fake bait. At best it’s an idea somebody prototyped but won’t use.

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I’m over 40 and I usually stand up about half of my working day. But I wouldn’t want to stand in an airplane because it’s cramped.

    • Joeffect@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      What could go wrong standing for two hours… Nothing probably if you’re a healthy young individual

        • Valmond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Only if you do it on a regular basis, not a one-shot like this (if you do not stand a lot usually).

          Also, Turbulence!

          • neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            apparently trombosis is a rather large problem even when flying only occasionally for vacations. That’s what I meant.

            But yeah, turbulences could give you a headache lol

        • bluewing@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I don’t know about how much fat it might take, but my 2 knee surgeries and both my deteriorating hip joints, (been searching eBay for a good used hip joint for cheap), tell me that standing for 2 hours is a painful idea.

          • JulieLemming@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            39 minutes ago

            They will lock in place and you will be gucci for 10 hours

            Afterwards you just ask this 6’3 bear like guy to give you a slight kick and off the ramp you slide out like a newborn out of uterus

        • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Just wait til they stick these on international flights. You’ll stand 14 hours and you’ll love it, peasant.

  • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    14 hours ago

    That’s right, girls. Start packing on those pounds because the only airline seat that poops, then lies about it doesn’t have farts in the headrest anymore.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Honestly, that may actually be more comfortable for me than trying to fold my legs into the tiny rows they have now.

    • turtlesareneat@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I am super torn here because pre-back-surgery me looks at these and says “the NERVE of these fuckers” and post-back-surgery me is like “Well that WOULD be nice yes”

  • nroth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Why don’t they do lay-down-only seats? Seems like you’d save the same amount of space or more with vastly more comfort.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The serious non-joke answer is the same as the one for these standing seats: emergency exit speed. When an airplane crash lands you have like less than 2 minutes to get everyone out before the huge inferno happens and roasts people. So for standing seats that pack even more people into an airplane, they have to prove that they can still get everyone out before the deadline. For laying-down seats they would have to prove the same thing.

      • burntrealm@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Not only that, but also the mess it would make. Airlines make good money off of selling food and drinks, how are you going to consume those laying down? Very messily, that’s how. More mess = more time spent cleaning the plane = less time in the air = less ticket sales. Not to mention the loss in drink and food sales from people who don’t want to do that laying down. It’s a lose lose for the airline.

        • zaperberry@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          I would pay a premium ticket price to get a lay down seat at the back of the plane and have no food service in that zone. That gets rid of the food sales loss, for which I have never paid for anyway, as I’d be paying a higher ticket price. I guess at that point there is still a concern regarding a mess, since I can bring my own snacks, but it’s not like I would be getting some memory foam mattress with Egyptian cotton sheets with the way airlines would implement this anyway. I’d get a long pleather vinyl cushion with maybe a standard pillow.

          It would be worse than what I got in the Navy, slightly, but still better than any shit airplane seat I’ve sat in.

          • faltryka@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            There is already a premium ticket price for lay down seats on large commercial passenger jets. Many of those first class seats go all the way down.

      • qarbone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I’ve been on enough planes to believe 2 minutes of evacuation time will see 5% evacuated and 95% trampled before the fiery inferno.

        • TheRealKuni@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Remarkably, it has happened. People suddenly decide to pay attention to authority when they’re in a terrifying situation they’ve never experienced.

          • qarbone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 hours ago

            What I’ve chosen to glean from this is that I should inflict varied and new terrors upon coworkers to help keep us on track.

            • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              42 minutes ago

              excellent, the boss will be proud of the new performance numbers, therapy will no longer be covered by insurance to improve the sense of dread.

      • recall519@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Just lean it forward and have everyone slide down and out of the emergency slide.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Why don’t they do lay-down-only seats?

      Bigger and older passengers would find it more difficult to get into the top bunk than to ride a standing-only seat.

      But it’s all shit regardless. Boeing can barely even make planes that don’t fall apart on the runway. The American airline industry’s fleet is increasingly defunct. The FAA is gutted. Airports are falling into disrepare due to mismanagement. You’ll be lucky to get any kind of air travel in another decade.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Bigger and older passengers would find it more difficult to get into the top bunk than to ride a standing-only seat.

        Wouldn’t the same group have trouble standing for an entire flight?

        If only there was some sort of halfway point between lying down and standing up, something which would be easier to than lying down, but wouldn’t be as physically demanding as standing up.

        Oh well.

          • Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            Hmm…

            Well that’s one thing I can’t really complain about in Finland, access to physically disabled people. Its honestly pretty great, it’s been in the infra-design and all design mentality for decades.

            Anywhere there is public access, you’ll probably also find disabled access.

            Like just today, I felt a little bit proud, as I spotted an outhouse built to specifications allowing wheelchair access.

            We aren’t the utopia people seem to think we are, but if you’re in a wheelchair, you’ll still get access to nice nature paths on which to be depressed on. So that’s nice.

    • CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yeah, since this is a shit post, why don’t they wrap the passengers like a piece of luggage and store them on a shelf? Save so much room… Just give them diapers! /S

    • MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      And if the plane fails, jump out of the plane with the chair and sit down/stand up as you’re about to hit the ground.

      You won’t receive any fall damage during the animation.

      (Make sure to check patch notes, this is a 2020 update exploit)

  • wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Honestly I didn’t even realize until now how good the cropping is on lemmy compared to redd*t. holy shit the number of memes that came from screenshots of twitter screenshotted on insta screenshotted on whatever the fuck but this one was profile.

  • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    How people can look at (mostly) state owned rail vs private airlines and still think the free market benefits the average person is one of life’s big mysteries to me.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I mean, Trump won the vote, and Brexit won the vote… Something tells me it’s as simple as most people are fucking stupid.

  • barsoap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The lengths the US will go to to avoid building high-speed rail.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Because of course it’s Ryanair.

        Oh, you want a seat? That’s an extra £50. Each. Both ways. Go fuck yourselves.

        The EU needs to regulate the fuck out of that shitbag company.

      • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s a capitalism thing.

        Extract as much value as possible. Deliver as little value to your customers as possible. Treat them as second layer of product.

        Human needs are not the goal.

        • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Yep, nobody ever tried to exploit their fellow humans until capitalism was adopted in the 18th century. The other economic systems that existed parallel to capitalism were also exploitation-free.

          • Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            12 hours ago

            It is weird when you criticize one thing and people start saying shit like this, as if your critique of the one thing, is an endorsement of everything else.

          • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            19 hours ago

            I never suggested otherwise. However capitalism’s core motivator is exploitation.

            It is in no way wrong to suggest we move away from such a model, or criticize such a model.

          • Lesrid@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            The point isn’t that capitalism is worse, but that it isn’t any better. Despite all the fancy clothes and powdered wigs there is still a class oppressing another class except now the oppressors enjoy far fewer violent deaths.

            At least a king had the decency to die several hundred feet behind the poor fucking levies in the same muck as them.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          23 hours ago

          The UK can barely get high speed rail going to Birmingham where they’ve already got tracks. The rest of HS2 got cancelled.

          I don’t see how the same thing under the sea would ever get done.

          Plus trains here are more expensive than planes for no reason whatsoever other than greed.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            23 hours ago

            I was going to add a jab at the Brits but then thought “nah, they’re going to do that themselves, much more effective that way”.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            22 hours ago

            The rest of HS2 got cancelled.

            Practically as an act of economic sabotage. British people hate their country and are actively trying to destroy it from within

            • Blackmist@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Any non-car related spending is a “war on motorists”.

              Seemingly half the country think that millionaire man-of-the-people Nigel Farage will be the one to lead us to the sunlit uplands, and the only position he’s never flip-flopped on is bringing back smoking in pubs.

              We are doomed.