weird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 2 days agoThe duality of mansub.wetshaving.socialexternal-linkmessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1597arrow-down111
arrow-up1586arrow-down1external-linkThe duality of mansub.wetshaving.socialweird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square31fedilink
minus-squareZwiebel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoNo that is ambigous, it could also mean the opposite of asexual (aka allosexual)
minus-squareSeptimaeus@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoAnd the ambiguity fits bisexuality better anyway. It’s useful too. You can use it to cut the knot on the bi-vs-pan debate, for example, or avoid silly arguments about gender distribution of partners, or say “nunya,” etc.
No that is ambigous, it could also mean the opposite of asexual (aka allosexual)
And the ambiguity fits bisexuality better anyway. It’s useful too. You can use it to cut the knot on the bi-vs-pan debate, for example, or avoid silly arguments about gender distribution of partners, or say “nunya,” etc.