Just to clarify, I google a lot while coding, but one thing I learnt from my engineering degree is that is there is no ‘best’ solution.
Just to clarify, I google a lot while coding, but one thing I learnt from my engineering degree is that is there is no ‘best’ solution.
Exactly. It’s like vibe coders are not interested in writing the best code possible. They just want to write the code and not understand what goes on when a program is run.
I find this statement to be a bit contradictory to your point of ‘there is no “best” solution’
I don’t think vibe-coding is particularly good thing, but I find it completely normal for someone to just want to vibe something up and not want to understand. It’s not always a useful approach, but sometimes it might be a ‘best’ strategy, too
I’d guess most of them aren’t even capable of actually writing functional and good code themselves. And never will be.
I can write bad and unfunctional code all by myself thank you very much.
Vibe coders wishfully think AI could be the end product. AI is a tool, it should never be the final product nor exposed to the user.
It’s a fancy autocomplete to throw ideas against, you still need to know what the fuck you’re doing, and vibe coders have no clue. This means we’re now concerned about a rise in vulnerable code.
As well as unmaintainable code, and in countries with good employment laws and/or employers, extremely unproductive employees. And a whole new generation split between skillful and LLM users.
That’s right. My concern is also that LLM users may shadow skilled programmers in the short term, potentially devaluing their skills or putting some of them out of a job, at least until the LLM-built code starts shitting itself and they crawl back to actual programmers for help.
Look at it positively: Even if many skilled programmers get fired, it’s not like most of us won’t survive. And once the bubble pops, we’re the ones needed the most. Including getting headhunted and good salaries.