• nesc@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is one of the least informed articles I’ve ever read. Phrases like “From Moscow’s perspective, the Russians need to bolster their defenses to protect themselves from NATO expansion” is just a cherry on top. Lmao.

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Why? That is the stance Russia has been communicating for years.

      And when countries like Germany turn around and say they want the strongest army in Europe and support the idea of spending 200 Billion yearly on defense, that is perceived as a threat.

      It is classical security dilemma.

      • nesc@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Because they don’t care about NATO nor they fear any kind of invasion they’ve left borders with with countries in NATO empty for three years. Germany is in their right to spend however they want. r*ssia delenda est

        • Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Again, this is the stance of Russia, as the NYT reported. Doesnt mean its true. But if the media would only report if politicians say true things, well the news would be rather short.