Devagiri admitted to working with others in 2020 and 2021 to cause DoorDash to pay for deliveries that never occurred. At the time, Devagiri was a delivery driver for DoorDash orders. Under the scheme, Devagiri used customer accounts to place high value orders and then, using an employee’s credentials to gain access to DoorDash software, manually reassigned DoorDash orders to driver accounts that he and others controlled. Devagiri then caused the fraudulent driver accounts to report that the orders had been delivered, when they had not, and manipulated DoorDash’s computer systems to prompt DoorDash to pay the fraudulent driver accounts for the non-existent deliveries. Devagiri would then use DoorDash software to change the orders from “delivered” status to “in process” status and manually reassign the orders to driver accounts he and others controlled, beginning the process again. This procedure usually took less than five minutes, and was repeated hundreds of times for many of the orders.

The scheme resulted in fraudulent payments exceeding $2.5 million.

  • J52@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Woah, 20yrs max…, it seems to only pay when you steal from the poor and have train loads of lawyers at hand.

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    DoJ won’t prosecute doordash for misclassifying the delivery drivers as ICC and many other instance of wage theft but they got all the reosurces in the world to waste over 2.5 million dollars which is a rounding error for any corpo lol

    Tell you you all you need to know about American “justice” system

    fucking clowns

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Tell you you all you need to know about American “justice” system

      Don’t know if you know, but we’re going with “legal system” now to reflect the reality.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The law is whatever daddy says it is thats the legal system fot sure. But these are criminal charges though and the victims will get sent federal gulag for their brave assault on corpo’s bank account. Martyrs!

  • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    So many technically smart criminals being busted by just not having OPSEC. Dude did the technical theft and left his IP wide open. Get behind seven proxies.

    What a fucking moron. Like DoorDash isn’t going to notice this shit?

    edit: so it’s been pointed out that you must have a legit ID to sign up for DoorDash and they probably didn’t track him down on the internut. I guess I have to assume that a smart guy that had a DD account found this hole and exploited it with his own DD account. his. own. DD. account. That’s super dumb, even dumber than I thought at first. Why wouldn’t he use my DD account? Why wouldn’t he use yours? (I don’t have a DD account)

    edit again: why do so many people want to downvote in this thread and not tell me why this motherfucker is one of the dumbest criminals ever? There’s been a few that want to argue but no one can tell me why he’s not a complete idiot.

    • Sophienomenal@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Moot point, as DoorDash driver accounts require a verified driver’s license, comprehensive background check, and a valid bank account set up to deposit payment (though after setting up a direct deposit bank account, you can add alternative cash out options). Haven’t used DoorDash in a while, but UberEats started requiring facial recognition on top of all that, so I wouldn’t be surprised if that were in the DoorDash driver app, too. Hiding IP would do quite literally nothing in this scenario, as you can’t create an account anonymously. Counterfeit IDs would not work as they are verified against state records. Oh, and yet another step, you have to provide proof of auto insurance, which is yet another connection to your identity.

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Where did you see that? I didn’t see anything in the article or in the linked indictment article.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Did he really just leave his IP wide open? Or did they somehow manage to get through his seven proxies to find him?

      I know I’m being paranoid. What I don’t know is if I’m being paranoid enough.

      • Forester@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Pro tip if you’re going to rob a bank don’t use your car as the getaway car. Vinyl wrapping your car doesn’t change the fact that it’s your car.

          • EightBitBlood@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Reddit had an AMA with a Bank Robber ten years ago that they’ve since deleted for corpo purity reasons 😂

            Here’s the big points from it:

            • Banks don’t care about losing amounts under 5k.
            • Security won’t stop you if you don’t have a visible weapon.
            • Worst they do is lock the door, so bring a hammer.
            • the goal is to get in, and get the teller to give you a couple grand asap, then leave under 10 minutes.
            • Guy did this to at least 5 different banks (all different companies) in one day, once a month, for several months.

            He eventually got caught because of the money he had, not because his face was on every security camera.

            He recommends not doing this, as do I, as it’s just not worth it.

            But just in case you wanted to know how it was done a decade ago, fuck Reddit, here’s the details they recently deleted.

            • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              Reddit used to have an entire shoplifting subreddit (r/shoplifting for the wayback) that regularly made fun of the loss prevention subreddit and the two subs often stole ideas from each other and would taunt each other. There was obvious sexual tension between them

              Ofc it got banned even though it was technically a “roleplay” sub

            • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Fraud is something that a prosecutor has to prove in the court of lawhat we got her eis some allegations made by a corpo parasite.

              Looks like DoJ wasted taxpayer resources to him corporate feel better

            • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              10 hours ago

              You remind me of that one kid in class who was intelligent enough to realize the teacher forgot to assign homework, but lacked the wisdom to shut the hell up and walk out the door.

              • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                9 hours ago

                You remind me of that one kid in class who never got a date.

                (WTF? How can a joke reply generate this level of acrimony?)

    • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I don’t think doordash lets you use a VPN.

      Many platforms that deal with finance would reject an order when they detect VPNs or Tor (since that’s what fraudsters and scammers use), or they ask for additional verification (like SMS) to verify you are in fact the account holder. So they probably were just using their real IP address.

      • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Well in this case a proxy isn’t a VPN, but an intermediate the criminal has taken control of. A proxy does not have to be legitimate.

        • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          True, but again, you’re making a lot of assumptions here. I don’t see anything about proxies anywhere.

          He probably got caught because of an internal audit, that’s the assumption I would make.

  • kevincox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’m struggling to see how this actually made money. Because presumably the customer is paying for the delivery (as well as the food that was never ordered). So the fraudsters would just be paying themselves in a complicated way. My best guess is one of the following:

    1. DoorDash is subsidizing orders so much that this is profitable overall (the amount they pay the driver is more than the customer pays) seems unlikely.
    2. DoorDash is paying the driver multiple times but only charging the customer once. But if this was the case how was this obvious accounting issue never noticed? Shouldn’t the books come out even in the end?
    • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      10 hours ago

      There is no customer involved.

      1. They place an order and pay for it
      2. They force the order to be assigned to one of the drivers
      3. Driver claims the order is delivered
      4. Doordash pays the driver
      5. They overwrite the data so that it goes back to step by 2.
      6. They “deliver” and get paid for the same order hundreds of times.

      Books were probably red, but it takes a while to identify something like this.

    • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Simple. Manual reassigns are very unusual and that all being done by one employee (like an actual employee of Doordash that works on the digital platforn, not a driver), and they all are assigned to a small group of drivers. That would look very obvious if someone looked at the logs.

      All they need is one confession from any of the driver, or the employee involved in this scheme, then the whole thing unravels.

      Also, I’m under the impression that they stole customer accounts to make those orders. Customers would’ve reported that fraudulent purchases were made.