• ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      I never claimed that in this case. As I said in my response: There have been won lawsuits that machines are allowed to index and analyze copyrighted material without infringing on such rights, so long as they only extract objective information, such as what AI typically extracts. I’m not a lawyer, and your jurisdiction may differ, but this page has a good overview: https://blog.apify.com/is-web-scraping-legal/

      EDIT: For the US description on that page, it mentions the US case that I referred to: Author’s Guild v Google

      • bufalo1973@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        You might not remember but decades ago Microsoft was almost split in two. But then it came to pass that George Bush “won” the elections. And the case was dismissed.

        In the US justice system, money talks.

        • ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Oh I agree money talks in the US justice system, but as the page shows, these laws also exist elsewhere, such as in the EU. And even if I or you don’t agree with them, they are still the case law that determines the legality of these things. For me that aligns with my ethical stance as well, but probably not yours.