If “migrants” have no right to appeal to the courts, citizens don’t really have the ability to either.
Consider?
Pretty sure they’ve been doing that from the start.
If “migrants” have no right to appeal to the courts, citizens don’t really have the ability to either.
“Oh he’d never do that to real Americans…”
Meanwhile, the leopards are waiting.
The leopards yearn for the faces.
I doubt this administration is going to stop pushing it’s lawlessness unless there is push back with consequences. Throw Stephen Miller into a CIA black site and watch how fast this crazy shit stops.
Stephen Miller? The migrant? Yeah, sounds good. I heard he crossed the Darien Gap by eating five toddlers as rations.
*Trying to suspend
The headline is not doing constitutional democracy and the rule of law any favors by making casual readers think they have that power, which (sorry to be all technical, NYT) they do not have.
(sorry to be all technical, NYT)
No reason to apologize. The NYT routinely do it on purpose, especially when it comes to cops and Israel.
detained illegal immigrants
FTFY NY Times.
It’s also a lie. They’re not “trying to”, they said that it is something that they might consider. It has been done 4 times before too.
This administration has repeatedly shown not to care about the status or criminal history of any non-US-born person. Also, they have revoked the status of legal migrants to be able to call them “illegal migrants” directly after, despite them doing everything correctly and being in America legally until the rug was pulled out from under them.
And aside from all of that, why are we okay with the government even thinking of doing this to anybody??? That should be a major red flag even as something they are considering. But based on their previous actions, it’s definitely something they want to do, which is even worse
EDIT: Just realized your username is “freedom advocate”. You of all people should be against this.
Randomly generated username.
Why are we ok with it? No one said they’re ok with it. I was simply commenting on the lies the NYT are spreading.
So far I’m seeing that what they wrote was far more accurate than what you did.
Oh yeah, none of the immigrants were here legally at all
/sThe illegal ones? No, they’re not - hence being illegal immigrants lol.
The point was that the regime (“administration”) has cast their net far too wide; they’re not rounding up just illegal immigrants as you suggest, you wretched fuck. But of course you already know that and you’re just here to troll—or are you so fucking stupid to blindly believe that the regime has only acted against illegal immigrants?
Buh-bye! 👋
Your retarded laws aren’t legitimate idiot. Country aren’t house, stop hoarding the land. All they are for is to enforce racial segregation
> FreedomAdvocate
> Dosen’t support freedom of movement.randomly generated username
supports legal immigration, dislikes criminals and law breakers
jumps at legal justification for their racism the second they get the chance under the incredibly flimsy guise of “law and order” just like every other Nazi
